Evaluación de la calidad ética y del contenido de los recursos online para padres

  1. Arminda Suárez Perdomo 1
  2. Sonia Byrne 1
  3. María José Martínez Rodrigo, María José Rodrigo 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Laguna
    info

    Universidad de La Laguna

    San Cristobal de La Laguna, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01r9z8p25

Journal:
Comunicar: Revista científica iberoamericana de comunicación y educación

ISSN: 1134-3478

Year of publication: 2018

Issue: 54

Pages: 19-28

Type: Article

DOI: 10.3916/C54-2018-02 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Comunicar: Revista científica iberoamericana de comunicación y educación

Metrics

Cited by

  • Scopus Cited by: 10 (21-01-2023)
  • Dialnet Metrics Cited by: 5 (26-01-2023)
  • Web of Science Cited by: 6 (04-01-2023)

JCR (Journal Impact Factor)

  • Year 2018
  • Journal Impact Factor: 3.338
  • Journal Impact Factor without self cites: 3.063
  • Article influence score: 0.288
  • Best Quartile: Q1
  • Area: EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Quartile: Q1 Rank in area: 10/243 (Ranking edition: SSCI)
  • Area: COMMUNICATION Quartile: Q1 Rank in area: 9/88 (Ranking edition: SSCI)

SCImago Journal Rank

  • Year 2018
  • SJR Journal Impact: 0.851
  • Best Quartile: Q1
  • Area: Communication Quartile: Q1 Rank in area: 59/490
  • Area: Education Quartile: Q1 Rank in area: 196/1575
  • Area: Cultural Studies Quartile: Q1 Rank in area: 25/1139

Índice Dialnet de Revistas

  • Year 2018
  • Journal Impact: 3.610
  • Field: COMUNICACIÓN Quartile: C1 Rank in field: 1/65
  • Field: EDUCACIÓN Quartile: C1 Rank in field: 1/237

CIRC

  • Social Sciences: A+

Scopus CiteScore

  • Year 2018
  • CiteScore of the Journal : 4.8
  • Area: Cultural Studies Percentile: 99
  • Area: Education Percentile: 95
  • Area: Communication Percentile: 95

Journal Citation Indicator (JCI)

  • Year 2018
  • Journal Citation Indicator (JCI): 3.24
  • Best Quartile: Q1
  • Area: COMMUNICATION Quartile: Q1 Rank in area: 5/198
  • Area: EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Quartile: Q1 Rank in area: 6/717

Abstract

The quality of the online resources for parents offering access to open knowledge has hardly received attention despite their increasing number. This paper provides a framework to examine the ethical and content quality of parenting resources. The ethical criteria were based on “the Health on the Net” (HON) framework whereas the content criteria were based on the Positive Parenting framework and the effectiveness of the learning materials used. The criteria were applied to a survey of international websites (n=100) for Spanishspeaking parents. Chisquare analyses showed that websites from Spain, official companies sites and information sites, as compared to South American, parents’ and interactive sites, scored higher in the ethical criteria of privacy, authority, justifiability and financial disclosure. Hierarchical cluster analysis applied to content criteria showed that the High quality websites, unlike the Low quality ones, valued gender equality, a positive parental role, modeled a variety of parenting practices, educational contents with multimedia formats, and made use of experiential, academic and technical information. Privacy, financial disclosure and justifiability were more likely to be found in the High and Medium quality content clusters. In conclusion, the study illustrates some of the challenges of open knowledge and sets out the priority areas for quality improvement for website designers and for professionals who want to help parents develop effective skills for searching for trustworthy sources

Funding information

El presente estudio contó con el apoyo del Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (MINECO), del Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), en el marco de las subvenciones PSI2015-69971-R y EDU2012-38588.

Bibliographic References

  • Amichai-Hamburger, Y., McKenna, K.Y., & Tal, S.A. (2008). E-empowerment: Empowerment by the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1776-1789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.002
  • Bangdiwala, S.I. (2017). Graphical aids for visualizing and interpreting patterns in departures from agreement in ordinal categorical observer agreement data. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2016.1273941
  • Baujard, V., Boyer, C., & Geissbühler, A. (2010). Evolution of Health Web certification, through the HONcode experience. Swiss Medical Informatics, 26(69), 53-55. (https://goo.gl/RZp5Sg).
  • Bergman, L.R., Magnusson, D., & El-Khouri, B.M. (2003). Studying individual development in an interindividual context: A person-oriented approach. London: Psychology Press. (https://goo.gl/qsXTD6).
  • Brady, E., & Guerin, S. (2010). Not the romantic, all happy, coochy coo experience: A qualitive analysis of interactions on an Irish parenting web site. Family relations, 59(1), 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2009.00582.x
  • Cheung, M.K., Lee, M.K.O., & Rabjohn, N. (2008). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth-The adoption of online opinions in online customer communities. Internet Research, 18(3), 229-247. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240810883290
  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient for agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale. (https://goo.gl/yeqvLg).
  • Council of Europe (2006). 19 Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member States on policy to support positive parenting. Strasbourg. (https://goo.gl/Sk2BQG).
  • Dworkin, J., Connell, J., & Doty, J. (2013). A literature review of parents’ online behaviour. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 7(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2013-2-2
  • Ebata, A., & Curtiss, S.L. (2017). Family life education on the technological frontier. In S.F. Duncan & H.S. Goddard (Eds.), Family life education: Principles and practices for effective outreach (pp. 236-626). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. (https://goo.gl/5PtQq3).
  • García-Peñalvo, F. J., García-de-Figuerola, C., & Merlo-Vega, J.A. (2010). Open knowledge: Challenges and facts. Online Information Review, 34(4), 520-539. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521011072963
  • Haberman, S.J. (1973). The analysis of residuals in cross-classified tables. Biometrics, 29(1), 205-220. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529686
  • Healthonnet.org (2017). Heatlh on the Net (HON): HonCode: Principios en español. (https://goo.gl/eP73wT).
  • Hughes, R., Bowers, J.R., Mitchell, E.T., Curtiss, S., & Ebata, A.T. (2012). Developing online family life prevention and education programs. Family Relations, 61(5), 711-727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00737.x
  • Internet Live Stats (2016). Internet Users by country. (https://goo.gl/1xiZfR).
  • Madge, C., & O'Connor, H. (2006). Parenting gone wired: Empowerment of new mothers on the Internet? Social & Cultural Geography, 7(2), 199-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360600600528
  • McDaniel, B.T., Coyne, S.M., & Holmes, E.K. (2012). New mothers and media use: Associations between blogging, social networking, and maternal well-being. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 16(7), 1509-1517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-011-0918-2
  • Muñetón M., Suárez, A., & Rodrigo, M.J. (2015). El uso de recursos web como apoyo a la educación de los hijos en los padres colombianos. Investigación & Desarrollo, 23(1), 91-116. https://doi.org/10.14482/indes.23.1.6496
  • Myers-Walls, J.A., & Dworkin, J. (2016). Parenting education without borders. Web-based outreach. In J.J. Ponzetti (Ed.), Evidence-based Parenting Education. A global perspective (pp. 123-139). New York: Routledge. (https://goo.gl/HC2TXm).
  • Niela-Vilén, H., Axelin, A., Salanterä, S., & Melender, H.L. (2014). Internet-based peer support for parents: a systematic integrative review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(11), 1524-1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.06.009
  • Nieuwboer, C.C., Fukkink, R.G., & Hermanns, J.M. (2013a). Peer and professional parenting support on the Internet: a systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavioral and Social Networks, 16(7), 518-528. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0547
  • Nieuwboer, C.C., Fukkink, R.G., & Hermanns, J.M. (2013b). Online programs as tools to improve parenting: a meta-analytic review. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(11), 1823-1829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.08.008
  • Rodrigo, M.J., Almeida, A., & Reichle, B. (2016). Evidence-based parent education programs: A European perspective. In J. Ponzetti (Ed.), Evidence-based parenting education: A global perspective (pp. 85-104). New York: Routledge. (https://goo.gl/HC2TXm).
  • Rodrigo, M.J., Byrne, S., & Álvarez, M., (2016). Interventions to promote positive parenting in Spain. In M. Israelashvili, & J.L. Romano (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of international prevention science (pp. 929-956). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (https://goo.gl/nrYhEk).
  • Rodrigo, M.J., Máiquez, M.L., Martín, J.C., & Rodríguez, B. (2015). La parentalidad positiva desde la prevención y la promoción. In M.J. Rodrigo, M.L. Máiquez, J.C. Martín, S. Byrne, & B. Rodríguez (Eds.), Manual práctico en parentalidad positiva (pp. 25-44). Madrid: Síntesis. (https://goo.gl/RpHwpB).
  • Rothbaum, F., Martland, N., & Jannsen, J.B. (2008). Parents’ reliance on the web to find information about children and families: Socio-economic differences in use, skills and satisfaction. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(2), 118-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2007.12.002
  • Sarkadi, A., & Bremberg, S. (2005). Socially unbiased parenting support on the Internet: a cross sectional study of users of a large Swedish parenting website. Child: Care, Health and Development, 31(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2005.00475.x
  • Suárez, A., Rodrigo, M.J., & Muñetón, M. (2016). Parental activities seeking online parenting support: Is there a digital skill divide? Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, 54, 36-54. (https://goo.gl/H5yCxb).