Indicadores y control estadístico para el seguimiento y evaluación de preferencias de aprendizaje de estudiantes universitarios

  1. Olga María Alegre de la Rosa 1
  2. Luis Miguel Villar Angulo 2
  1. 1 Universidad de La Laguna
    info

    Universidad de La Laguna

    San Cristobal de La Laguna, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01r9z8p25

  2. 2 Universidad de Sevilla
    info

    Universidad de Sevilla

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03yxnpp24

Revista:
RED: revista de educación a distancia

ISSN: 1578-7680

Año de publicación: 2017

Número: 55

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.6018/RED/55/2 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: RED: revista de educación a distancia

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Introducción. Las universidades españolas adoptan indicadores de resultados como práctica destacada de renovación institucional. En este estudio se analizan indicadores de resultados universitarios (tasas de éxito, eficiencia, graduación, abandono y rendimiento de los estudiantes universitarios) de distintos campos del conocimiento, para contrastarlos con la opinión de las comisiones de calidad de los distintos centros universitarios. Método. Se utilizaron métodos mezclados: un análisis cuantitativo de las medias de los porcentajes obtenidos para los diferentes campos del conocimiento para los cinco indicadores de resultados y un análisis cualitativo mediante un DAFO (debilidades, amenazas, fortalezas y oportunidades) con la opinión de las comisiones de calidad de las titulaciones en seis dimensiones de contenido: programa formativo, infraestructura y recursos, estudiantes, profesores, y elementos institucionales. Resultados. Ciencias de la Salud se muestra como la única rama del conocimiento que mejora en tasa de éxito en tres años, sin embargo Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas e Ingeniería y Arquitectura mejoran en eficiencia. La rama de Artes y Humanidades tiene el porcentaje de deserción más alto. Discusión. Encontramos similitudes con otros estudios en la dirección de la mejora en tasas de éxito en Ciencias de la Salud, que contrasta con las tasas de deserción de Ingeniería y Arquitectura, así como la baja tasa de finalización de estudios en el grado de Historia del Arte. Conclusiones. Se plantea una revisión longitudinal de la metodología docente de las asignaturas, la formación en docencia universitaria, el establecimiento de un plan de mejora para el aprendizaje mezclado y a distancia, y el rendimiento de los estudiantes.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Al-Arimi, A.M.A.-K. (2014). Distance Learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 82-88.
  • Alegre, O.M., & Villar, L.M. (2007). Evaluación de la formación en línea del profesorado de cinco universidades españolas. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento (RUSC), 1(4), 1-13.
  • Arce, M.E, Crespo, B., & Míguez-Álvarez, C. (2015). Higher Education Drop-Out in Spain Particular Case of Universities in Galicia. International Education Studies, 8(5), 247-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n5p247.
  • Bowman, N.A. (2014). Conceptualizing Openness to Diversity and Challenge: Its Relation to College Experiences, Achievement, and Retention. Innovative Higher Education, 39(4), 277-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-014-9281-8.
  • Burd, E., & Hodgson, B. (2016). Attendance and Attainment: a five year study. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(2), 1-12.
  • Casero-Martínez, A. (2016). Deconstrucción del “buen profesor”. Análisis de las características formales y no formales de la docencia universitaria. RELIEVE, 22(2), art. 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.7203/relieve.22.2.9419.
  • Çelik, E. (2015). Mediating and moderating role of academic self-efficacy in the relationship between student academic support and personal growth initiative. Australian Journal of Career Development, 24(2), 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1038416215583563.
  • Cheng, X., Wang, X., Huang, J., & Zarifis, A. (2016). An Experimental Study of Satisfaction Response: Evaluation of Online Collaborative Learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(1), January, 60-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i1.2110.
  • Christensen, S.S., & Spackman, J.S. (2017). Dropout Rates, Student Momentum, And Course Walls: A New Tool For Distance Education Designers. Journal of Educators Online, 14(2). https://www.thejeo.com/archive/archive/2017_142/christensen_spackmanpdf.
  • Contreras, F., & Contreras, G.J. (2015). Raising the Bar for Hispanic Serving Institutions:
 An Analysis of College Completion and Success Rates. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 14(2), 151-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192715572892.
  • Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln. Y.S. (2011). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Fourth Edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Donhardt, G.L. (2013). The Fourth-Year Experience: Impediments to Degree Completion. Innovative Higher Education, 38(3), 207-221.
  • Dumford, A.D., & Miller, A.L. (2015). Assessing alumni success: income is NOT the only outcome! Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(2), 195-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1098587.
  • El Hassan, K. (2014). Investigating Conditions for Student Success at an American University in the Middle East. Higher Education Studies, 4(5), 62-74. Doi:10.5539/hes.v4n5p62.
  • Elliott, D.C. (2016). The impact of self-beliefs on post-secondary transitions: The moderating effects of institutional selectivity. High Education, 71(3), 415-431.
  • EURASHE (Asociación Europea de Instituciones de Educación Superior) (2015). Recuperado de https://www.eurashe.eu/library/151020-23-redue-buenos-aires-bmr_ppt-pdf/ (10 mayo 2017).
  • Fojtik, R. (2015). Comparison of full-time and distance learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 402-407.
  • Ghanizadeh, A. (2016). The interplay between reflective thinking, critical thinking, self-monitoring, and academic achievement in higher education. Higher Education, 74(1), 1-14. Doi: 10.1007/s10734-016-0031-y.
  • Gupta, G., & Mishra, R.P. (2016). A SWOT analysis of reliability centered maintenance framework. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 22(2), 130-145.
  • Hen, M., & Goroshit, M. (2014). Academic Procrastination, Emotional Intelligence, Academic Self Efficacy, and GPA: A Comparison Between Students With and Without Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(2), 116-124 . Doi: 10.1177/002219412439325.
  • Henrie, C.R., Bodily, R., Manwaring, K.C., & Graham, Ch. R. (2015). Exploring Intensive Longitudinal Measures of Student Engagement in Blended Learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 131-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2015.
  • Heublein, U. (2014). Student drop‐out from German Higher Education institutions. European Journal of Education, 49(4), 497-513.
  • Howell, G.F., & Buck, J.M. (2012). The Adult Student and Course Satisfaction: What Matters Most?. Innovative Higher Education, 37(3), 215-226.
  • Hu, S. (2011). Reconsidering the Relationship Between Student Engagement and Persistence in College. Innovative High Education, 36(2), 97-106. doi: 10.1007/s10755-010-9158-4.
  • Kucel, A., & Vilalta-Buf, M. (2013). Why do tertiary education graduates regret their study program? A comparison between Spain
 and the Netherlands. High Education, 65(5), 565579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9563-y.
  • Lassibille, G., & Navarro-Gómez, L. (2008). Why do higher education students drop out? Evidence from Spain. Education Economics, 16(1), 89-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09645290701523267.
  • Loureiro, E., Ferreira, M.A., Fresta, M., Ismail, M., Rehman, S.U., & Broome, M. (2017). Teaching and assessment of clinical communication skills: Lessons learned from a SWOT analysis of Portuguese Angolan and Mozambican Medical Education. Porto Biomedical Journal, 2(2), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbj.2016.12.005.
  • Markova, T., Glazkova, I., & Zaborova, E. (2017). Quality Issues of Online Distance Learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 685-691.
  • Marra, R.M., Tsai, Ch.-L., Bogue, B., & Pytel, J.L. (2015). Alternative Pathways To Engineering Success –Using Academic And Social Integration To Understand Two-Year Engineering Student Success. American Journal of Engineering Education, 6(2), 69-83. Doi:10.1145/2788451.
  • Mihaljevic, M. (2008). Examining the Efficiency of Croatian Higher Education: An Application of Student Attainment Modeling. Eastern European Economics, 46(1), 74-88. Doi: 10.2753/EEE0012-8775460105.
  • Morris, L.V. (2012). All Together Now: Degree Completions!. Innovative Higher Education, 37(3), 167-169. Doi:10.1007/s10755-012-9220-5.
  • Nadelson, L.S., Semmelroth, C., Martinez, G., Featherstone, M., Fuhriman, C.A., & Sell, A. (2013). Why Did They Come Here? The Influences and Expectations of First-Year Students' College Experience. Higher Education Studies, 3(1), 50-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/hes.v3n1p50.
  • Nelson, K., Quinn, C., Marrington, A., & Clarke, J. (2012). Good practice for enhancing the engagement and success of commencing students. Higher Education, 63(1), 83‐96. https://Doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9426-y.
  • Pérez, F., Aldás, J. (eds.), Aragón, R., & Zaera, I. (2016). U-Ranking 2016. Synthetic Indicators of Spanish Universities. Fourth edition, March 2016. Valencia: Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas.
  • Pike, G.R., Hansen, M.J., & Childress, J.E. 
 (2014). The Influence Of Students’ Pre-College Characteristics, High School Experiences, College Expectations, And Initial Enrollment Characteristics On Degree Attainment. J. College Student Retention, 16(1), 1-23. https://Doi.org/10.2190/CS.16.1.a.
  • Rapport, M.J.K., Stelzner, D., & Rodriguez, J (2007). The Doctor of Physical Therapy Degree: A New Curriculum for a New Degree. Physical Disabilities: Education and Related Services, 26(1), 63-76.
  • Raynor, K. (2016). Book Review: Determined to Succeed? Performance versus Choice in Educational Attainment. Teaching Sociology, 43(1), 70-71. Doi: 10.1177/0092055X.
  • Richardson, J.T.E. (2012). The attainment of White and ethnic minority students in distance education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(4), 393-408. http://dx.Doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.534767.
  • Richardson, J.C., Koehler, A.A., Besser, E.D., Caskurlu, S., Lim, J., & Mueller, Ch.M. (2015). Conceptualizing and Investigating Instructor Presence in Online Learning Environments. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), June. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2123.
  • Romero-Gutierrez, M., Jimenez-Liso, M.R., & Martinez-Chico, M. (2016). SWOT analysis to evaluate the programme of a joint online/onsite master's degree in environmental education through the students’ perceptions. Evaluation and Program Planning, 54, 41-49. Doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.10.001.
  • Stevenson, J. (2012). An Exploration of the Link between Minority Ethnic and White Students’ Degree Attainment and Views of Their Future ‘Possible Selves’. Higher Education Studies, 2(4), 103-113.
  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research (Second Edition). Washington: Sage.
  • Thomas, S., Chie, Q.T., Abraham, M., Raj, S.J., & Beh, L.S. (2014). A Qualitative Review of Literature on Peer Review of Teaching in Higher Education: An Application of the SWOT Framework. Review of Educational Research, 84(1), 112-159. Doi:10.1007/s10734-0079093-1.
  • Troiano, E., & Elias, M. (2014). University access and after: explaining the social composition of degree programmes and the contrasting expectations of students. Higher Education, 67(5), 637-654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9670-4.
  • Vayre, E., & Vonthron, A.M. (2017). Psychological Engagement of Students in Distance and Online Learning: Effects of Self-Efficacy and Psychosocial Processes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(2), 197-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116656849.
  • Villar-Aguilés, A., Hernàndez i Dobon, F.J., & García-Ros, R. (2017). Reubicándose en la universidad. Propuesta de una tasa de reubicaciones a partir de un estudio de trayectorias educativas. RELIEVE, 23(1), art. 5, 1-11. http://Doi.org/10.7203/relieve.23.1.9059.
  • Villar, L.M., & Alegre, O.M. (2008). Measuring Faculty Learning in Curriculum and Teaching Competence (CTC) Online Courses. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(2), 169-181. Doi: 10.1080/10494820701365937.
  • Wright, S. L., Jenkins-Guarnieri, M.A., & Murdock, J.L. (2012). Career Development Among First Year College Students: College Self-Efficacy, Student Persistence, and Academic Success. Journal of Career Development, 40(4), 292-310. https://Doi.org/10.1177/0894845312455509.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet