Percepciones sobre la implementación de las TIC en la autonomía de los IES de la Ciudad Autónoma de Melilla
- Campos Soto, Antonio 1
- Trujillo Torres, Juan Manuel 1
- Ruiz Palmero, Julio 2
- Sánchez Rodríguez, José 2
-
1
Universidad de Granada
info
-
2
Universidad de Málaga
info
ISSN: 1577-4147
Argitalpen urtea: 2018
Alea: 48
Zenbakia: 2
Orrialdeak: 213-233
Mota: Artikulua
Beste argitalpen batzuk: Publicaciones: Facultad de Educación y Humanidades del Campus de Melilla
Laburpena
This investigation analyses the perceptions which, regarding the relation between the use of ICTs and the level of organisational and pedagogical autonomy, management teams and teacher coordinating bodies have in high schools in the multicultural context of the autonomous city of Melilla. It has been used a mixed methodology. In the quantitative research we have worked with an invited sample (population) of 181 teachers, which 164 (90,60%) have accepted collaborating in the study, but finally have answered 145 (80,11%). The research has been completed with 8 semi-structured interviews to teachers who are in management teams and to educational projects coordinators. The results suggest that both management teams as well as didactic coordinating bodies use ICTs in an organisational level, while at a pedagogical level, the use of ICTs does not give a greater autonomy to the high schools in the autonomous city of Melilla. In this research, we depart from the principles that the LOMCE conclude on the necessity of encouraging the innovation and driving the educational centers’ autonomy as referents for the overall improvement of them.
Erreferentzia bibliografikoak
- Astiz, M. F. (2015). Autonomía educativa en la provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina: comparación entre dos distritos escolares. Una perspectiva neo-institucionalista. Educação & Sociedade, 36(132), 647-673. doi: 10.1590/es0101-73302015152402
- Bocchio, M. C., & Lamfri, N. Z. (2013). Autonomía y gestión directiva en el centro del discurso de las políticas educativas para la educación secundaria en Argentina.
- Christ, C., & Dobbins, M. (2016). Increasing school autonomy in Western Europe: a comparative analysis of its causes and forms. EUROPEAN SOCIETIES, 18(4), 359-388. doi: 10.1080/14616696.2016.1172716
- Educational autonomy in Buenos Aires, Argentina: a comparison among school districts. A neo-institutionalist perspective]. Educação & Sociedade, 36(132), 647-673. doi:10.1590/es0101-73302015152402
- Fitzmaurice, S. (2017). Unregulated autonomy: uncredentialed educational interpreters in ural schools. American Annals of the Deaf, 162(3), 253-264.
- Gairín, J. (2008). Autonomía, calidad y evaluación. En La autonomía de los centros escolares (pp. 81–130). Subdirección General de Información y Publicaciones. Recuperado de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2886478.
- Gairin Sallán, J. (2005). La descentralización educativa: ¿una solución o un problema? WK Educación. Recuperado de https://books.google.es/books?id=zDkQxF-s060C&lpg=PP1&hl=es&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false
- Gorissen, C. J., Kester, L., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Martens, R. (2015). Autonomy supported, learner-controlled or system-controlled learning in hypermedia environments and the influence of academic self-regulation style. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(6), 655–669.
- Guisado, N. F., Gargallo, M. A. S., de Esteban Villar, M., Delhaxhe, A., Pont, B., Legrand, A., … Díaz, J. M. (2009). La autonomía de los centros educativos: VI Encuentros sobre educación en el Escorial (UCM). Recuperado de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=562170
- Hetfleisch, P., Goeze, A., & Schrader, J. (2014). Implementation of an evidence-based pedagogical concept: The impact of educational autonomy on its effectiveness in practice. Zeitschrift Fur Erziehungswissenschaft, 17(2), 297-322. doi:10.1007/s11618-014-0515-4
- Nir, A., Ben-David, A., Bogler, R., Inbar, D., & Zohar, A. (2016). School autonomy and 21st century skills in the Israeli educational system Discrepancies between the declarative and operational levels. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(7), 1231-1246. doi:10.1108/ijem-11-2015-0149
- Popov, R. (2017). Self-actualization and self-fulfillment in the context of students’ autonomy development within the educational process.Science and Education(5), 134-139. doi:10.24195/2414-4665-2017-5-23
- Keddie, A. (2015). School autonomy, accountability and collaboration: a critical review. Journal of educational administration and history, 47(1), 1–17.
- Keddie, A. (2016). Maintaining the Integrity of Public Education: A Comparative Analysis of School Autonomy in the United States and Australia. COMPARATIVE EDUCATION REVIEW, 60(2), 249-270.
- MEC. (2006). Ley Orgánica 2/2006, de 3 de mayo, de Educación. BOE, 106.
- MECyD. (2013). Ley Orgánica 8/2013, de 9 de diciembre, para la mejora de la calidad educativa. BOE. Recuperado de www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2013-12886
- San Fabián Maroto, J. L. (2011). El papel de la organización escolar en el cambio educativo: la inercia de lo establecido. Recuperado de http://repositorio.minedu.gob.pe/handle/123456789/986
- Souza, Â. R. d. (2003). Reformas educacionais: descentralização, gestão e autonomia escolar. Educar em Revista, (22), 17-49. doi: 10.1590/0104-4060.311
- Stano, R. de C. M. (2015). The way of a faculty continuing education group: sharing the practice of teachers for a pedagogy of/towards autonomy. Educar em Revista, (57), 275–290.
- Weiner, J. M., & Woulfin, S. L. (2017). Controlled autonomy: novice principals’ schema for district control and school autonomy. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, 55(3), 334-350. doi: 10.1108/JEA-03-2016-0032
- Wermke, W., & Forsberg, E. (2017). The changing nature of autonomy: Transformations of the late Swedish teaching profession. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(2), 155–168.