The contrastive value of lexical stress in visual word recognitionEvidence from Spanish

  1. Alberto Domínguez Martínez 1
  2. Fernando Cuetos Vega 2
  1. 1 Universidad de La Laguna
    info

    Universidad de La Laguna

    San Cristobal de La Laguna, España

    GRID grid.10041.34

  2. 2 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    GRID grid.10863.3c

Journal:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Year of publication: 2018

Volume: 30

Issue: 3

Pages: 276-282

Type: Article

Export: RIS

Abstract

Background: Many pairs of words in Spanish, in particular many verbal forms, differ only in the syllable stressed, such as aNImo (I encourage) and aniMÓ (he encouraged). Consequently, word stress may acquire a lexical contrastive value that has been confi rmed by Dupoux, Pallier, Sebastian, and Mehler (1997) for Spanish speakers though not for French speakers in auditory perception. Method: This study contrasts the priming effect produced by pairs of written words that differ only in their stress pattern with the priming effect in repetition priming, stress only priming (with no orthographic relation), and morphological priming, in visual word recognition. Results: The results, using short and masked prime presentation, showed facilitation for different stress (orthographically identical) pairs (rasGÓ/RASgo) compared to totally unrelated pairs (dorMÍ/RASgo) but no facilitation compared to orthographically unrelated (but stress related) pairs (PERsa/RASgo). However, identity pairs (RASgoRASgo) produced facilitation compared to both orthographically unrelated conditions. At long SOA, orthographically related (stress unrelated) pairs produced signifi cant facilitation, as occurred with morphologically related pairs (RASga/RASgo), on the orthographically unrelated words (PERsa/ RASgo). Conclusion: These results confi rm the early and prelexical importance of word stress for lexical selection in Spanish, as is the case with orthographic and phonological features

Bibliographic References

  • Alameda, J.R. & Cuetos, F. (1995). Diccionario de frecuencias de las unidades lingü í sticas del castellano [Spanish dictionary of frequencies of the linguistic units]. Oviedo: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo.
  • Alvarez, C.J., Urrutia, M., Dominguez, A., Sanchez-Casas, R. (2011). Processing infl ectional and derivational morphology: Electrophysiological evidence from Spanish. Neuroscience Letters, 490(1), 6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.12.015
  • Amenta, S. & Crepaldi, D. (2012) Morphological Processing as We Know It: An Analytical Review of Morphological Effects in Visual Word Identifi cation. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(232), 1-12 doi: 10.3389/ fpsyg.2012.00232
  • Andrews, S. (1997) The effects of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: resolving neighborhood confl icts. Psychological Bulletin & Review, 4(4), 439-461. doi: 10.3758/BF03214334
  • Arciuli, J. & Slowiaczek, L.M., (2007). The where and when of linguistic word-level prosody. Neuropsychologia, 45(11), 2638-2642. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.03.010
  • Black, M. & Byng, S. (1986). Prosodic constraints on lexical access in reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3(4), 369-409. doi: 10.1080/02643298608252028
  • Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading task. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of Information processing (pp. 151-216). San Diego, CA Academic Press.
  • Cutler, A. (1986) Forbear is a homophone: lexical prosody does not constrain lexical access. Language and Speech, 29(3), 201-220. doi: 10.1177/002383098602900302
  • Cutler, A. & Carter, D.M. (1987). The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech and Language, 2(3-4), 133-142. doi: 10.1016/0885-2308(87)90004-0
  • Cutler, A. & Clifton, C.E. (1985). The use of prosodic information in word recognition. In H. Bouma & D.G. Bouwhuis (Eds.) Attention and Performance X (pp 183-196). Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Domí nguez, A., de Vega, M. & Barber, H. (2004). Event Related Potentials elicited by morphological, homographic and semantic priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(4), 598-608. doi: 10.1162/ 089892904323057326
  • Domí nguez, A., Seguí , J. & Cuetos, F. (2002). The time course of infl ectional morphological priming. Linguistics, 40(2), 235-259. doi: 10.1515/ling.2002.011
  • Dupoux, E.; Pallier, C.; Sebastián, N.; Mehler, J. (1997). A destressing deafness in French. Journal of Memory and Language, 36(3), 406421. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.2500
  • Eddington, D. (2000). Spanish stress assignment within Analogical Modeling of Language. Language, 76(1), 92-109. doi: 10.1353/ lan.2000.0022
  • Forbach, G.B., Stanners, R.F. & Hochhaus, L. (1974). Repetition and practice effects in a lexical decision task. Memory & Cognition, 2(2), 337-339. 10.3758/BF03209005
  • Forster, K. & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and the frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10(4), 680-698. doi: 10.1037/02787393.10.4.680
  • Grainger, J. (1992). Orthographic neighborhoods and visual word recognition. In R. Frost and L. Katz (Eds.) Orthograhy, phonology, morphology and meaning (pp. 131-146. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
  • Grainger, J., Cole, P. & Segui, J. (1991). Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(3), 370-384. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90042-I
  • Gutiérrez, N., Palma, A., y Santiago, J. (1998, September). On the role of lexical stress in visual word recognition. Paper presented at the XI European Society for Cognitive Psychology conference, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Gutiérrez-Palma, N. & Palma-Reyes, A. (2008). On the use of lexical stress in reading Spanish. Reading and Writing, 21(6), 645-660. 10.1007/s11145-007-9082-x
  • Harris, J.W. (1989). How different is verb stress in Spanish. Probus ,1(3), 241-258. doi: 10.1515/prbs.1989.1.3.241
  • Marcet, A., & Perea, M. (2017). Is nevtral NEUTRAL? Visual similarity effects in the early phases of written-word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(4), 1180–1185. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1180-9
  • Morales-Font, A. (2014). El acento [The accent]. In R. A. Núñez., S. Colina., y T. G. Bradley (Eds.). Fonología generativa contemporánea de la lengua española [Contemporary generative phonology of the Spanish language] (2nd Edition) (pp. 235-265). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Pensado, C. (1999). Morfología y fonología, fenómenos morfofonológicos [Morphology and phonology, morphophonological phenomena]. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.) Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española. Vol. 3: Entre la oración y el discurso. Morfología [Descriptive Grammar of the Spanish language. Vol.3: Between the sentence and de discourse] (pp. 4423-4504). Madrid. Espasa Calpe.
  • Perea, M., Abu Mallouh, R., Mohammed, A., Khalifa, B., & Carreiras, M. (2016). Do diacritical marks play a role at the early stages of word recognition in Arabic? Frontiers in Psychology, 22(7), 1255. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01255
  • Perea, M., Abu Mallouh, R., Mohammed, A., Khalifa, B., & Carreiras, M. (2018). Does visual letter similarity modulate masked form priming in young readers of Arabic? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 169, 110-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.12.004
  • Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (2000). Repetition and form priming interact with neighborhood density at a short stimulus onset asynchrony. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7(4), 668-677. doi: 10.3758/ BF03213005
  • Roca, I. (1988). Theoretical implications of Spanish word stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 19(3), 393-423. Retrieved from http://www.jstor. org/stable/25164902.
  • Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C. & Scarborough, H. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3(1), 1-17. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.3.1.1
  • Segui, J. & Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 65-76. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.65
  • Soto, S., Cutler, A. and Sebastián, N. (2001). Segmental and suprasegmental mismatch in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(3), 412-432. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2783
  • Sulpizio, S., Spinelli, G., & Burani, C. (2015). Stress affects articulatory planning in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(6), 453-461. doi: 10.1037/ xhp0000163