Aborto eugenésicoactitud ante el diagnóstico de un feto malformado

  1. Rubí Nieves Rodríguez Díaz 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Laguna Hospital Universitario de Canarias
Journal:
Dilemata

ISSN: 1989-7022

Year of publication: 2015

Issue: 17

Pages: 23-50

Type: Article

Abstract

The eugenic abortion is the voluntary interruption of the pregnancy when it is possible to predict with probability or certainty that the fetus will be born with a fault or disease. The Law of Sexual and Reproductive Health and of Voluntary Interruption of the Pregnancy, it establishes that it will be possible realize an abortion in the cases that there exists risk of serious anomalies in the fetus, foetal incompatible anomalies with the life or an extremely serious and incurable disease in the moment of the diagnosis and like that a Clinical Committee confirms it. In Spain, in 2010 3.361 pregnancies were interrupted voluntarily invoking risk for the fetus, whereas in 2011 they were 3.590 pregnancies. These abortions represent near 3 % of the total of all the interruptions: 2, 8 % for risk of serious anomalies in the fetus, and 0, 3 % for serious life incompatible anomalies or extremely serious or incurable disease.

Bibliographic References

  • BAIRD, D., NØRGAARD, L., NILAS, I. “Medical versus surgical abortion: comparing satisfaction and potential confounders in a partly randomized study”. Human Reproduction, 20 (3 Mar) (2005), pp. 834–838.
  • BAIRD. D. T. “Medical abortion in the 1st trimester. Best Practices” Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol, 2 (2002), pp. 221–236.
  • BERMEJO, E. Frecuencia de defectos congénitos al nacimiento en España y su comportamiento temporal y por comunidades autónomas. Causas de las variaciones de las frecuencias. Semergen, 36, (2010), 449-455.
  • CAMERON, S. Induced abortion and psychological sequelae. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 24 (2010) 657–665. 2010.
  • CRANDEL L. Psychological outcomes of medical versus surgical elective first trimester abortion. Nurs Womens Health. 2012 Aug-Sep;16(4):296-307.
  • FAÚNDES, A. & MIRANDA, L. Unsafe Abortion. Reference Module in Biomedical Sciences. 2014.
  • GALTON, F. Herencia y eugenesia. Alianza Editorial, Madrid, 1988, p. 165.
  • GOULD H, FOSTER D, PERRUCCI A, BARAR R., ROBERTS C. Predictors of Abortion Counseling Receipt and Helpfulness in the United States. Women’s Health Issues 23-4 (2013) e249-e255.
  • JOHNSTON H, GALLO M, BENSON J. Reducing the costs to health systems of unsafe abortion: a comparison of four strategies. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2007: 33(4).
  • IYENGAR K, IYENGAR S. Elective abortion as a primary health service in rural India: experience with manual vacuum aspiration. Reproductive Health Matters, 2002, 10:54– 63.
  • LØKELAND M1, IVERSEN OE, ENGELAND A, ØKLAND I, BJØRGE L., “Medical abortion with mifepristone and home administration of misoprostol up to 63 days› gestation.” Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Jul;93(7):647-53. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12398. Epub 2014 May 23.
  • MENDOZA C, PÉREZ DE LA ROSA, B, CASTRO L, VILA M, FANG F., PADILLA A. Resultados de la interrupción voluntaria del embarazo. Ley. 28 Congreso Nacional de Ecografía Obstétrico Ginecológica. SESEGO. Pamplona 2014.
  • NISANDA, I. & BETTAHARB, K. “Medical management of unwanted pregnancy in France: modalities and outcomes. The aMaYa study.” Israel Nisanda, Karima Bettaharb,. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. Volume 184, January 2015, Pages 13–18.
  • RAYMOND, E. G., GROSSMAN, D. WEAVER, M. A. TOTI, S. & WINIKOFF, B. “Mortality of induced abortion, other outpatient surgical procedures and common activities in the United States.” Contraception. Volume 90, Issue 5, November 2014, Pages 476–479.
  • RØRBYE C, NØRGAARD M, NILAS L. Medical versus surgical abortion: comparing satisfaction and potential confounders in a partly randomized study. Hum Reprod, 20 (3 Mar) (2005), pp. 834–838.
  • SEDGH, G. SINGH, S. HENSHAW, S. K., BANKOLE, A. et al. Induced abortion: incidence and trends worldwide from 1995 to 2008. The Lancet : February 18th, 2012. Vol. 379, Issue 9816, Pages 625-632.
  • The Prevention and Management of Unsafe Abortion. Report of a Technical Working Group. World Health Organization (WHO).Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 1992.
  • Unsafe Abortion: Global and Regional Estimates of the Incidence of Unsafe Abortion and Associated Mortality in 2000. World Health Organization (WHO). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2004.
  • -Unsafe abortion. Global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2008. Sixth Ed. WHO, 2011.
  • Interrupción Voluntaria del Embarazo. Datos definitivos correspondientes al año 2010. Sanidad. Ministerio de Sanidad, Política social e Igualdad.
  • -Aborto sin riesgos: guía técnica y de políticas para sistemas de salud. 2ª Edición. OMS 2012.