Adaptación al español de la escala de desempeño cívico de Coleman y Borman (2000) y análisis de la estructura empírica del constructo

  1. Luis Fernando Díaz Vilela
  2. María Dolores Díaz Cabrera
  3. María Rosa Isla Díaz
  4. Estefanía Hernández Fernaud
  5. Christian Rosales Sánchez
Journal:
Revista de psicología del trabajo y de las organizaciones = Journal of work and organizational psychology

ISSN: 1576-5962

Year of publication: 2012

Volume: 28

Issue: 3

Pages: 135-150

Type: Article

Export: RIS
DOI: 10.5093/tr2012a11 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

Metrics

Cited by

  • Scopus Cited by: 10 (20-10-2021)
  • Dialnet Métricas Cited by: 6 (11-11-2021)

SCImago Journal Rank

  • Year 2012
  • SJR Journal Impact: 0.148
  • Best Quartile: Q4
  • Area: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management Quartile: Q4 Rank in area: 145/188
  • Area: Social Psychology Quartile: Q4 Rank in area: 203/242

CIRC

  • Social Sciences: A

CiteScore

  • Year 2012
  • CiteScore of the Journal : 0.2
  • Area: Social Psychology Percentile: 8
  • Area: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management Percentile: 5

Abstract

This article presents the results of a research in which the citizenship performance questionnaire from Coleman and Borman (2000) was adapted into Spanish and its empiric structure was analyzed. Once the original questionnaire was translated and adapted to a Spanish public administration context, it was administered to a sample of 135 public employees representing the complete staff of an Autonomic Government unit. Results show a high internal consistency of the questionnaire, although it seems to measure three interdependent dimensions. Two of these dimensions are highly stable and coincide with those proposed by LePine, Erez and Johnson (2002), Generalized Compliance and Altruism, while the third dimension is difficult to interpret. A second order factor analysis supports the existence of a unique underlying dimension of citizenship performance. These results have theoretical as well as practical implications that may help the interpretation and diagnosis in this domain.

Bibliographic References

  • Bateman, T. S. y Organ, D. W. (1983). Job Satisfaction and the Good Soldier: The Relationship Between Affect and Employee "Citizenship". Academy of Management Journal, 26, 587-595.
  • Borman, W. C. y Motowidlo, S. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. En N. Schmitt, & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey - Bass.
  • Borman, W. C. y Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10, 99-109.
  • Borman, W. C., Penner, L. A., Allen, T. D. y Motowidlo, S. J. (2001). Personality predictors of citizenship performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 52-69.
  • Choi, J., Peters, M. y Mueller, R. O. (2010). Correlational analysis of ordinal data: from Pearson's r to Bayesian polychoric correlation. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11, 459-466.
  • Christiansen, N. D., Goffin, R. D., Johnston, N. G. y Rothstein, M. G. (1994). Correcting the 16PF for faking: Effects on criterion-related validity and individual hiring decisions. Personnel Psychology, 47, 847-860.
  • Coleman, V. I. y Borman, W. C. (2000). Investigating the underlying structure of the Citizenship Performance domain. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 25-44.
  • Dorsey, D. W., Cortina, J. M. y Luchman, J. (2010). Adaptive and citizenship-related behaviors at work. En J. L. Farr, & N. T. Tippins (Eds.), Handbook of employee selection (pp. 463-487). New york: Routledge.
  • Dunnette, M. D., McCartney, J., Carlson, H. C. y Kirchner, W. K. (1962). A study of faking behavior on a forced choice self-description checklist. Personnel Psychology, 15, 13-24.
  • Ekström, J. (2008). A Generalized Definition of the Polychoric Correlation Coefficient. Obtenido de UCLA Statistics electronic publications: http://preprints.stat.ucla.edu/
  • Ekström, J. (2009). An empirical polychoric correlation coefficient. Obtenido de UCLA Statistics electronic publications: http://preprints.stat. ucla.edu/
  • Ellingson, J. E., Smith, D. B. y Sackett, P. R. (2001). Investigating the influence of social desirability on Personality factor structure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 122-133.
  • Hernández-Cabrera, J. A. (2012). ULL R Toolbox. Obtenido de https://sites.google.com/site/ullrtoolbox
  • Hoffman, B. J., Blair, C. A., Meriac, J. P. y Woehr, D. J. (2007). Expanding the criterion domain? A Quantitative review of the OCB literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 555-566.
  • Hogan, J., Rybicki, S. L., Motowidlo, S. J. y Borman, W. C. (1998). Relations between contextual performance, personality, and occupational advancement. Human Performance, 11, 189-207.
  • Hough, L. M., Eaton, N. K., Dunnette, M. D., Kamp, J. D. y McCloy, R. A. (1990). Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 581-595.
  • Juras, J. y Pasaric, z. (2006). Application of tetrachoric and polychoric correlation coefficients to forecast verification. Geofisika, 23, 59-82.
  • Kroger, R. O. y Wood, L. A (1993). Reificatiom Faking, and the Big Five. American Psychologist, 48, 1297-1298.
  • LePine, J. A., Erez, A. y Johnson, D. E. (2002). The Nature and Dimensionality of Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 52-65.
  • McDonald, R. P. (1978). Generalizability in factorable domains: "domain validity and generalizability". Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 75-79.
  • McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Motowidlo, S. J. y Schmit, M. J. (1999). Performance assessment in unique jobs. En D. R. Ilgen, & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.) The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development (pp. 56-87). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Mueller-Hanson, R., Heggestad, E. D. y Thornton III, G. C. (2003). Faking and selection: Considering the use of personality from select-in and select-out perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 348-355.
  • Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
  • Organ, D. W. y Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48, 775-802.
  • Ployhart, R. E., Schneider, B. y Schmitt, N. (2006). Staffing organizations. Contemporary practice and theory (3° ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Poropat, A. E. y Jones, L. (2009). Development and validation of a unifactorial measure of citizenship performance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 851-869.
  • R Development Core Team. (2008). A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Revelle, W. y zinbarg, R. E. (March 2009). Coefficients Alpha, Beta, Omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74, 145-154.
  • Salgado, J. F. (2005). Personalidad y deseabilidad social en contextos organizacionales: implicaciones para la práctica de la Psicología del Trabajo y las Organizaciones. Papeles del Psicólogo, 26, 115-128.
  • Salgado, J. F. y Cabal, A. L. (2011). Evaluación del desempeño en la Administración Pública del Principado de Asturias: Análisis de las propiedades psicométricas. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 27, 75-91.
  • Seibel, H. P., Wallbrown, F. H., Reuter, E. K. y Barnett, R. W. (1990). Further evidence concerning motivational distortion on the sixteen personality factor primaries by male felons. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 367-375.
  • Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W. y Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653-663.
  • Tabachnick, B. G. y Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics (4th Edition). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Uebersax, J. S. (2006). Introduction to the Tetrachoric and Polychoric Correlation Coefficients. Obtenido de http://www.john-uebersax.com/stat/tetra. htm
  • Viswesvaran, C. y Ones, D. S. (2000). Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 216-226.
  • Werner, J. M. (1994). Dimensions That Make a Difference: Examining the Impact of In-Role and Extra-role Behaviors on Supervisory Ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 98-107.
  • Witman, D. S., Van Rooy, D. L. y Viswesvaran, C. (2010). Satisfaction, citizenship behaviors, and performance in work units: A meta-analysis of collective construct relations. Personnel Psychology, 63, 41-81.