Condicionantes de la intención emprendedora en el alumnado universitarioUn análisis desde la perspectiva de género

  1. Ruiz de la Rosa (Universidad de La Laguna), Carmen Inés
  2. García Rodríguez (Universidad de La Laguna), Francisco 1
  3. Delgado Rodríguez (Universidad de La Laguna), Naira
  1. 1 Universidad de La Laguna
    info

    Universidad de La Laguna

    San Cristobal de La Laguna, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01r9z8p25

Revista:
Revista de Estudios Empresariales. Segunda época

ISSN: 1988-9046

Año de publicación: 2014

Número: 2

Páginas: 81-96

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de Estudios Empresariales. Segunda época

Resumen

En el presente trabajo se parte de las evidencias, constatadas en la literatura, en relación con la eficacia de la educación emprendedora como instrumento para el fomento de la intención de emprender, así como de la influencia de la variable género en la puesta en marcha de nuevas iniciativas empresariales. Adoptando la perspectiva de la teoría de la acción planificada, se analiza el efecto diferencial del género sobre la intención de emprender entre un grupo de alumnos/as participantes en un proyecto de educación emprendedora en el contexto universitario. Los resultados apuntan a que, si bien no se han encontrado diferencias de género en los niveles de intención emprendedora, sí que las variables predictoras de la misma difieren en función del sexo de los participantes. Así, en el caso de los hombres, la autoeficacia es la principal variable explicativa de la intención emprendedora, mientras que para las mujeres el factor determinante es la controlabilidad percibida. Este hecho puede tener importantes implicaciones de cara al diseño de programas de educación emprendedora, en relación con la necesidad de introducir elementos pedagógicos que distingan las capacidades y competencias a desarrollar para mujeres y hombres de cara a lograr mejoras de su intención emprendedora. 

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ajzen, I. (1991): “The theory of planned behavior”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
  • Ajzen, I. (2001): “Nature and operation of attitudes”, Annual Review of Psychology, 52, pp. 27-58.
  • Amit R, Zott C. (2001): “Value creation in e-business”, Strategic Management Journal, June July Special Issue 22, pp. 493–520.
  • Armitage, C. y Conner, M. (2001): “Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A metaanalytic review”, British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, pp. 471-499.
  • Athayde, R. (2009): “Measuring enterprise potential in young people”, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 33(2), pp. 481-500.
  • Audretsch, D. (2003): “Enterpeneurship: A Survey of the Literature”, Enterprise Papers, nº 14. Disponible en: http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/library/enterprisepapers/pdf/enterprise_paper_14_2003.pdf.
  • Bae, T, Qian, S, Miao, C and Fiet, J. (2014): “The Relationship Between Entrepreneurship Education and Entrepreneurial Intentions: A Meta-Analytic Review”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 38, nº 2, pp. 217–254.
  • Baker, T and Nelson, R (2005): “Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage”, Administrative Science Ouarterly, 50, pp. 329-366.
  • Baron, R.A. y Ensley, M.D. (2006):“Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs”, Management Science, vol. 52, nº 9, pp. 1331-1344.
  • Bechard, J and Gregorie, D (2005): “Entrepreneurship Education Research Revisited: The Case of Higher Education”, Academy of Management Learning and Education, vol. 4, nº 1, pp. 22–43.
  • Browne, M. W. y Cudeck, R. (1993): Alternative ways of assessing model fit, en K. A. Bollen y J. S. Long (eds.), Testing structural equation models, pp. 136-162, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Brush, C. (1997): “Women-owned businesses: Obstacles and opportunities”, Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 2 (1), pp. 1-24.
  • Chaganti, R. and Parasuraman, S. (1996): “A study of the impacts of gender on business performance and management patterns in small businesses”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21, pp. 73–75.
  • Chandler, G, DeTienne, D, McKelvie, A and Mumford, T (2011) :”Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study”, Journal of Business Venturing, 26 (3), pp. 375–390.
  • Chen, C. C., Greene, P. G. y Crick, A. (1998). “Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers?”, Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 13, pp. 295–316.
  • Clark, B (1998): Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
  • Commission of The European Communities (2003): “Green Paper. Entrepreneurship in Europe”, Brussels, European Commission. Available in: http://www.smallbusiness.outreach.ou.edu/teleconference/green_paper_final_en.pdf.
  • Commission of The European Communities (2006): “Implementing the Community Lisbon Programme: Fostering entrepreneurial mindsets through education and learning”, Brussels, European Commission. Available in: http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2006:0033:FIN:en:PDF.
  • Commission of The European Communities (2008): “Survey of Entrepreneurship in Higher Education”, Brussels, European Commission. Available in: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/files/support_measures/training_education/ highedsurvey_en.pdf.
  • Dale, G. (2011): “The Reinvention of Academic Entrepreneurship”, Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), pp. 1- 8.
  • Davis, H.G., Diamond, N (1997): The Rise of American Research Universities: Elites and Challengers in the Post-war Era. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
  • DeTienne D.R. y Chandler, G.N. (2007): “The Role of Gender in Opportunity Identification”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 31, nº 3, pp. 365– 386.
  • Do Paço, A. M. F., Ferreira, J. M., Raposo, M., Rodrigues, R. G., and Dinis, A. (2011): “Behaviours and entrepreneurial intention: Empirical findings about secondary students”, Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 9(1), pp. 20-38.
  • Etzkowitz, H and Dzisah, J (2008): “Rethinking development: circulation in the triple helix”, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, vol. 20, pp. 653–666.
  • Etzkowitz, H. (1998): “The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages”, Research Policy, vol. 27, pp. 823–833.
  • Etzkowitz, H., (2003): “Research Groups as ‘Quasi-firms’: The Invention of the Entrepreneurial University”, Research Policy, vol. 32, pp. 109–121.
  • Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A. and Gebhardt, C. (2000): “The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm”, Research Policy, vol. 29, pp. 313–330.
  • Fayolle, A. (2013): “Personal views on the future of entrepreneurship education”. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 25(7-8), pp. 692-701.
  • Fiet, J.O. (2000): “The pedagogical side of entrepreneurship theory”, Journal of Business Venturing, 16(2), pp. 101–117.
  • Fischer, E.M., Reuber, A.R., and Dyke, L.S. (1993): “A theoretical overview and extension of research on sex, gender, and entrepreneurship”, Journal of Business Venturing, 8, pp. 151–168.
  • Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research, Addison-Wesley.
  • García-Rodríguez, F. J., Gil-Soto, E., Ruiz-Rosa, I., and Sene, P. M. (2013): “Entrepreneurial intentions in diverse development contexts: a cross-cultural comparison between Senegal and Spain”, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, pp. 1-17.
  • Gartner, W. B. (1988): “Who is an entrepreneur?” is the wrong question”, American Journal of Small Business, 12(4), pp. 11–32.
  • Gartner, W. B., Shaver, K. G., Gatewood, E., and Katz, J. A. (1994). Finding the entrepreneur in entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(3), pp. 5-9.
  • Gatewood, E.J., Carter, N.M., Brush, C.G., Greene, P.G., and Hart, M.M. (2003): Women entrepreneurs, their ventures, and the venture capital industry: An annotated bibliography. Stockholm: ESBRI.
  • Gupta, V.K., Turban, D.B. y Bhawe, N.M. (2008): “The Effect of Gender Stereotype Activation on Entrepreneurial Intentions”, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 93, nº 5, pp. 1053–1061.
  • Gupta, V.K., Turban, D.B., Arzu Wasti, S. y Sikdar, A. (2009): “The Role of Gender Stereotypes in Perceptions of Entrepreneurs and Intentions to Become an Entrepreneur”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 33, nº 2, pp. 397- 417.
  • Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. y Black, W.C. (1999): Análisis multivariante, Prentice Hall, Madrid.
  • Honig, B. (2004): “Entrepreneurship education: Toward a model of contingency-based business planning”, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3(3), pp. 258–273.
  • Kalleberg, A.L. and Leicht, K.T. (1991): “Gender and organizational performance: Determinants of small business survival and success”, Academy of Management Journal, 34, pp. 136–161.
  • Katz, J.A (2003): “The Chronology and Intellectual Trajectory of American Entrepreneurship Education 1876-1999”, Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 18, pp. 283-300.
  • Kickul, J., Wilson, F., Marlino, D and Barbosa, S.D. (2008): “Are misalignments of perceptions and self-efficacy causing gender gaps in entrepreneurial intentions among our nation’s teens?”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, vol. 5, nº. 2, pp. 321-335.
  • Krueger Jr., N. F., and Brazeal, D. V. (1994). ”Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs”, . Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18, pp. 91-104.
  • Krueger, N. F., and Brazeal, D. V. (1994): ”Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18,
  • Kuratko, D. (2005): “The Emergence of Entrepreneurship Education: Development, Trends, and Challenges”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29 (5), pp. 577 – 598.
  • Kyrö, P., and Carrier, C. (2005): Entrepreneurial learning in universities: Bridges across borders. The Dynamics of Learning Entrepreneurship in a Cross-Cultural University Context, Ed.P.Kyrö and C.Carrier. University of Tampere: Research Centre for Vocational and Professional Education.
  • Langowitz, N.S. and Morgan, C. (2003): “Women entrepreneurs: breaking through the glass barrier, en J. Butler (ed.), New perspectives on women entrepreneurs, Greenwich, CT, Information Age Publishing, pp. 101-119.
  • Maes, J., Leroy, H. and Sels, L. (en prensa). “Gender differences in entrepreneurial intentions: A TBP multi-group analysis at factor and indicator level”, European Management Journal.
  • Martin, B. C., McNally, J. J., and Kay, M. J. (2013): “Examining the formation of human capital in entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of entrepreneurship education outcomes”, Journal of Business Venturing, 28(2), pp. 211-224.
  • Martin, B.C., McNally, J.J., and Kay, M.J. (2013): “Examining the formation of human capital in entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of entrepreneurship education outcomes”, Journal of Business Venturing, 28, pp. 211–224.
  • Mayer, H. (2008): “Segmentation and segregation patterns of women-owned high-tech firms in four metropolitan regions in the United States”, Regional Studies, vol. 42, nº 10, pp. 1357.
  • Minniti, M. and Bygrave, W.D. (2001). ”A dynamic model of entrepreneurial learning”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25, pp. 5–16.
  • Moriano, J.A., Gómez, A. Laguna, M. y Roznowski, B. (2008): Validación de un cuestionario para medir la intención emprendedora. Una aplicación en España y Polonia, en F.J. Morales, C. Huici, A. Gómez y E. Gaviria (eds.), Método, teoría e investigación en psicología social, Prentice Hall, Madrid.
  • Mueller, S.L. y Conway Dato-On, M. (2008): “Gender-role orientation as a determinant of entrepreneurial self-efficacy”, Journal of Development Entrepreneurship, vol. 13, nº.1, 3-20.
  • Neck, H. and Greene, P (2011): “Entrepreneurship Education: Known Worlds and New Frontiers”, Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), pp. 55–70.
  • O’Shea, R., Allen, T.J., Morse, K.P., O’Gorman, C. y Roche, F. (2007): “Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience”, R and D Management, vol. 37, pp. 1-16.
  • Peterman, N.E. and Kennedy, J. (2003): “Enterprise education: Influencing students perceptions of entrepreneurship”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, pp. 129–144.
  • Readings, W. (1996): The University In Ruins, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
  • Reynolds, P.D., Bygrave, W., and Autio, E. (2004): GEM 2003 Executive Report, Babson Park, MA: Babson College; London Business School, and Kansas City, MO: Kauffman Foundation, London, U.K
  • Ruiz, J., Camelo, C., De la Vega, I. y Coduras, A. (2012): “Mujer y desafío emprendedor en España. Características y determinantes”, Economía Industrial, 383.
  • Ruiz, J., Camelo, C., De la Vega, I., Coduras, A. y Justo, R (2010): “Mujer y desafío emprendedor en España”, Ministerio de Igualdad. Disponible en: http://www.uca.es/emprendedores/investigacion-y-estudio/informe-mujer-y-desafioemprendedor.
  • Sánchez, J. C. (2011): “University training for entrepreneurial competencies: Its impact on intention of venture creation”, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(2), pp. 239-254.
  • Sarasvathy, S., (2001): “Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency”, Academy of Management Review 26 (2), pp. 243–263.
  • Sarasvathy, S., (2008): Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK.
  • Shapero, A. (1975): “The displaced, uncomfortable entrepreneur”, Psychology Today, 9(11), pp. 83-88.
  • Shapero, A., and Sokol, L. (1982): The social dimensions of entrepreneurship, Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, Prentice Hall, pp. 72- 90, Englewood Cliffs NJ.
  • Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, F. and Al-Laham, A. (2007): “Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources”, Journal of Business Venturing, 22(3), pp. 566–591.
  • Srinivasan, R., Woo, C., and Cooper, A. (1994): “Performance determinants for male and female entrepreneurs”, in W.D. Bygrave, S. Birley, N.C. Churchill, E. Gatewood, F. Hoy, R.H. Keeley, et al. (eds.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, pp. 43–56.
  • Wellesley, MA: Babson Center for Entrepreneurial Studies. Volery, T., Müller, S., Oser, F., Naepflin, C., and Rey, N. (2013): “The Impact of Entrepreneurship Education on Human Capital at Upper‐Secondary Level”, Journal of Small Business Management, 51(3), pp. 429-446.
  • Wilson, F., Kickul, J., and Marlino, D. (2007): “Gender, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial career intentions: Implications for entrepreneurship education”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), pp. 387–406.
  • World Economic Forum (2009): Educating the next wave of entrepreneur, WEF, Suiza.
  • Zhang, Y., Duysters, G., and Cloodt, M. (2013): “The role of entrepreneurship education as a predictor of university students’ entrepreneurial intention”, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, pp. 1-19.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet