Importancia diferencial de los componentes fundamentales de la esquizotipiaun metaanálisis

  1. Ascensión Ángeles Fumero Hernández 1
  2. Manuel Rodríguez Valido 1
  3. Andrea Roa 1
  4. Wenceslao Peñate Castro 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Laguna

    Universidad de La Laguna

    San Cristobal de La Laguna, España


Revista latinoamericana de psicología

ISSN: 0120-0534

Year of publication: 2017

Volume: 49

Issue: 1-3

Pages: 5-18

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1016/J.RLP.2016.09.001 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista latinoamericana de psicología


Cited by

  • Scopus Cited by: 3 (21-01-2023)
  • Dialnet Metrics Cited by: 1 (25-01-2023)
  • Web of Science Cited by: 3 (10-01-2023)

JCR (Journal Impact Factor)

  • Year 2017
  • Journal Impact Factor: 1.2
  • Journal Impact Factor without self cites: 1.044
  • Article influence score: 0.123
  • Best Quartile: Q3
  • Area: PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Quartile: Q3 Rank in area: 77/135 (Ranking edition: SSCI)

SCImago Journal Rank

  • Year 2017
  • SJR Journal Impact: 0.299
  • Best Quartile: Q2
  • Area: Social Sciences (miscellaneous) Quartile: Q2 Rank in area: 213/611
  • Area: Psychology (miscellaneous) Quartile: Q3 Rank in area: 140/259


  • Social Sciences: A

Scopus CiteScore

  • Year 2017
  • CiteScore of the Journal : 2.0
  • Area: Social Sciences (miscellaneous) Percentile: 69
  • Area: Psychology (all) Percentile: 52

Journal Citation Indicator (JCI)

  • Year 2017
  • Journal Citation Indicator (JCI): 0.59
  • Best Quartile: Q3
  • Area: PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Quartile: Q3 Rank in area: 94/186


Schizotypy can be understood as a disorder included in the schizophrenia spectrum or as a psychometric trait that includes three factors: cognitive-perceptual, interpersonal, and disorganised. The first relates to strange beliefs and unusual perceptual experiences; the second, with anhedonia and deficits in interpersonal relationships, and the third, disorganisation, is identified with strange thoughts, behaviours, and language. Several studies have attempted to clarify which of these dimensions is more relevant when predicting the construct. To answer this question, a meta-analysis was conducted using a systematic review of the major databases comparing schizotypy dimensions associated with different categories: structure, health, and vulnerability markers. A total of 27 studies were selected from 300 items found. The results indicate that the interpersonal dimension seems to be related to clinical symptoms, while the cognitive-perceptual dimension dominates research on vulnerability markers. Cognitive disorganisation contributes to both topics. It is concluded that the dimensions of schizotypy have a differential importance in terms of the areas of psychological functioning under study