Propiedades psicométricas de la batería de evaluación de procesos cognitivos y de lectura en adultos con dislexia (beda)

  1. Días, Alicia
  2. Jiménez, Juan E.
  3. Mejía, Carolina
  4. Fabregat, Ramón
Journal:
International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology: INFAD. Revista de Psicología

ISSN: 0214-9877

Year of publication: 2014

Issue Title: Psicología del Desarrollo

Volume: 1

Issue: 1

Pages: 565-570

Type: Article

DOI: 10.17060/IJODAEP.2014.N1.V1.404 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology: INFAD. Revista de Psicología

Abstract

This study analyzed the psychometric properties of the Assessment Battery of Dyslexia in Adults (BEDA). Dyslexia persists into adulthood and the assessment should focus also on the underlying cognitive processes involved in dyslexia. Therefore, valid and reliable instruments tools to detect and assess adults with dyslexia are needed. BEDA was designed as a computer-assisted tool developed with web-based technology for the assessment of cognitive processes involved in university students with dyslexia (i.e., phonological awareness, orthographic processing, processing speed, lexical access, working memory and semantic processing). The standardization of BEDA has been conducted with undergraduate degree, master and PhD students from three Spanish universities (University of La Laguna, University of Girona and University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria). Finally, we propose that BEDA is part of an e-learning platform (Platform for Assistance and Intervention Dyslexia in Adults: PIADA), along with other identification and assistance tools, with the aim that can be used by teachers and university students, and thus help to meet the challenge to provide university students a resource that enables the identification of dyslexia and provide information to teachers on strategies and guidelines with students with reading disabilities.

Bibliographic References

  • Bar-Shalom, E.G., Crain, S. y Shankweiler, D. (1993). A comparison of comprehension and production in good and poor readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14,197-227.
  • Ben-Dror, I., Pollatsek, A. y Scarpati, S. (1991). Word identification in isolation and in context by college dyslexic students. Brain and Language, 40, 471-490.
  • Berninger, V. (1994). Reading and writing acquisition: a developmental neuropsychological approach. WC Brown & Benchmark, Madison: WI.
  • Bruck, M. (1990). Word recognition skills of adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 26, 439 – 454.
  • Bruck, M. (1992). Persistente of dyslexics’ phonological awareness deficits. Developmental Psychology, 28, 874 – 886.
  • Bruck, M. (1993 b). Word recognition and componenet phonological processing skills of adults with childhood diagnosis of dyslexia. Developmental Review, 13, 258-268.
  • Bull, R. y Scerif G. (2001). Executive functioning as a predictor of children’s mathematics ability: inhibition, switching, and working memory. Developmental Neuropsychology, 19: 273-93.
  • Callens, M., Tops, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). Cognitive profile of students who enter higher education with an indication of dyslexia. PloS one, 7(6), e38081. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038081
  • DeFries, J.C. & Baker, L.A. (1983). Colorado family reading study: Longitudinal analyses. Annals of Dyslexia. 33(1), 153-162.
  • Fawcett, A.J. y Nicolson, R.I. (1994). Naming speed in children with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 641-646.
  • Felton, R.H., Wood, F.B., Brown, L.S., Campbell, S.K. y Harter, M.R. (1987). Separate verbal working memory and naming deficits in attention deficit disorder and reading disability. Brain Lang, 31: 171-184.
  • Guzmán, R. y Jiménez, J.E. (2001). Estudio normativo sobre parámetros psicolingüisticos en niños de 6 a 8 años: la familiaridad subjetiva. Cognitiva, 13(2), 153-191.
  • Hatcher, J., Snowling, M. J., & Griffiths, Y. M. (2002). Cognitive assessment of dyslexic students in higher education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(Pt 1), 119–133. doi:10.1348/000709902158801
  • Jiménez, J.E. (2012). Dislexia en español. Prevalencia e indicadores cognitivos, culturales, familiares y biológicos. Madrid: Pirámide.
  • Jiménez, J.E. y Hernández-Valle, I. (2000). Word identification and reading disorders in the Spanish language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 267-275.
  • Johnson, D.J., & Blalock, J.W. (1987). Young adults with learning disabilities. Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton.
  • Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E. y Shaywitz, B. A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 1-14.
  • Mejía, C., Giménez de la Peña, A., & Fabregat, R. (2012). ATLAS versión 2: una experiencia en la Universitat de Girona. XXVIII Congreso Internacional AELFA: Asociación Española de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología.
  • Mejía, C., Giménez de la Peña, A., & Fabregat, R. (2013). Evidence for Reading-Writing Disabilities in Spanish University Students – Applying ADDA. The Scientific World Journal, 30.
  • Näslund, J.C. y Schneider, W. (1991). Longitudinal effects of verbal ability, memory capacity, and phonological awareness on reading performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 4, 375-392.
  • Olson, R.K., Forsberg, H., & Wise, B. (1994). Genes, environment and the development of orthographic skills. In V. Berninger (Eds), Varieties of orthographic knowledge, 1: Theoretical and developmental issues (pp. 27-71). Kluwer Academy Publishers. Orden del 13 de diciembre de 2010 por la que se regula la atención al alumnado con necesidades específicas de apoyo educativo en la Comunidad Autónoma de Canarias. Boletín Oficial de Canarias. Santa Cruz de Tenerife, 22 de diciembre de 2010.
  • Schank, R. C. (1982). Dynamic Memory: a Theory of Reminding and Learning in Computers and People. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Siegel, L.S. (1986). Phonological deficits in children with reading disabilities. Canadian Journal of Special Education, 2 (1), 45-54.
  • Siegel, L.S. y Heaven, R. (1986). Categorization of learning disabilities. En Ceci S.J., ed. Handbook of cognitive, social, and neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities. Vol.1. pp. (95-121). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Siegel, L.S. y Ryan, E.B. (1989). The development of working memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children. Children Develpmental, 60: 973-980.
  • Smith, S.D., Macaruso, P., W.J., Shankweiler, D. y Crain, S. (1989). Syntactic comprehension in young poor readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10,429-454.
  • Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 402-433.
  • Swanson, H. L., & Hsieh, C.-J. (2009). Reading Disabilities in Adults: A Selective Meta-Analysis of the Literature. Review of Educational Research, 79(4), 1362–1390. doi:10.3102/0034654309350931
  • Van den Bos, K. (1998). IQ, phonological awareness and continuous-naming speed related to Dutch poor decoding children’s perfomance on two word identification tests. Dyslexia, 4, 73-89.
  • Vellutino, F.R., & Scanlon, D.M. (1987). Phonological coding, phonological awareness, and reading ability: Evidence from a longitudinal and experimental study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 321–363.
  • Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system, Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 1-33.
  • Yap, R.A. y Van der Leij, A. (1993). Word processing in dyslexics: An automatic decoding déficit?. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 261-279.
Data source: Dialnet