A golpes con el público

  1. Tania Castellano San Jacinto
Journal:
Re-visiones

ISSN: 2173-0040

Year of publication: 2015

Issue: 5

Pages: 12

Type: Article

Author's full text: lock_openOpen access editor lock_openOpen access postprint

Abstract

Starting with Dadaism, which strikes the public’s moral standing, and above all with a certain kind of cinema which, according to Walter Benjamin, can punch the spectator awake, this article studies several different kinds of impact that contemporary art exerts. In this context, the possibility of an “acceptable shock” and an “unacceptable shock” is put forward, and, within both of these categories, the effectiveness of coming to blows with the audience is studied from the perspective of various different authors. On the other side of all this is the spectator abused by excess –whose modern antecedent we have situated in Georg Simmel’s blasé figure-, and another who is perhaps shaken up by the world before him, which would imply political mobilisation through art.

Bibliographic References

  • Adorno, T. W. y Horkheimer, M. (2005). Dialéctica de la ilustración. Madrid, Trotta.
  • Aitken D. (2006). Broken Screen. 26 Conversations with Doug Aitken. Expanding the Image, Breaking the Narrative. Nueva York, D.A.P./Distributed Art Publishers.
  • Barthes, R. (2009). Lo obvio y lo obtuso. Imágenes, gestos y voces. Barcelona, Paidós.
  • Beller, J. (1994). “Cinema, Capital of the Twentieth Century”, en Postmodern Culture, vol. 4, nº3. Disponible en: http://press.jhu.edu/journals/postmodern_culture/ (acceso octubre 2015)
  • Benjamin, W. (1990). Gesammelte Schriften. Libro I, vol. 3. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.
  • Benjamin, W. (2008). Obras. Libro I, vol. 2. Madrid, Abada.
  • Benjamin, W. (2010). Obras. Libro IV, vol. 1. Madrid, Abada.
  • Brill, D. (2010). Shock and the Senseless in Dada and Fluxus. Hanover, NH (EEUU), Dartmouth College Press/University Press of New England.
  • Conrad, T. (1978, marzo). “Diegesis and Violence in Narrativity”, en Phos. Center for Media Study
  • Journal, vol 1, nº1, pp. 1-5.
  • Deleuze, G. (2004). La imagen tiempo. Estudios sobre cine 2. Barcelona, Paidós.
  • Deleuze, G. y Guattari, F. (2006). Mil mesetas. Capitalismo y esquizofrenia. Valencia, Pre-textos.
  • Déotte, (2004). L’époque des appareils. París, Lignes & Manifestos.
  • Klein, N. (2012). La doctrina del shock. El auge del capitalismo del desastre. Madrid, Paidós/
  • Planeta.
  • Kubelka, P. (2000). “Interview with Peter Kubelka”, entrevista con Mekas, J. en Sitney P. A. (ed.), Film Culture Reader (pp. 285-299). Nueva York, Cooper Square Press.
  • Kuh, K. (1965, 29 de mayo). “A Jaded Glance at Shock Art”, en Saturday Review, p. 29.
  • McLuhan, M. (2009). Comprender los medios de comunicación. Las extensiones del ser humano. Barcelona, Paidós.
  • Michaud, P. A. (2006). Sketches. Histoire de l’art, cinema. París, Kargo & Éclat.
  • Molina, M. (2008). “La ‘metamorfosis de la percepción’ y dos de sus exponentes: Walter Benjamin y Dziga Vertov”, en Revista de Filosofía, nº 60, pp. 45-57.
  • Schaefer, C. (2003). Bored to Distraction. Cinema of Excess in End-of-the-Century. Mexico and Spain. Nueva York, State University of New York.
  • Virilio, P. (1998). La máquina de la visión. Madrid, Cátedra.
  • Virilio, P. (2001). El procedimiento silencio. Buenos Aires, Paidós.
  • Wees, W. C. (1992). Light Moving in Time. Studies in the Visual Aesthetics of Avant-Garde film. Berkeley, University of California Press.