Efectos secundarios y motivaciones de las personas jóvenes para escoger Formación Profesional

  1. Merino Pareja, Rafael
  2. Martínez García, José Saturnino
  3. Valls, Ona
Journal:
Papers: revista de sociología

ISSN: 0210-2862 2013-9004

Year of publication: 2020

Issue Title: Transiciones educativas y desigualdades sociales: una perspectiva sociológica

Volume: 105

Issue: 2

Pages: 259-277

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5565/REV/PAPERS.2776 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Papers: revista de sociología

Abstract

This article analyses young people’s expectations in their last year of compulsory education regarding which path to choose after completing compulsory education, particularly between academic and professional tracks. Secondly, it analyses the motivations of young people who have chosen the vocational training option. The theoretical framework is grounded in Boudon’s theory of secondary effects and identification with the school institution. Bivariate and multivariate techniques are used to analyse data from a longitudinal study that began in the academic year 2013-2014 with a sample of 2,056 young people. The main results are that the family’s educational level, but especially grades influence the expectation of going to high school or doing vocational training. The majority of young people who choose vocational training have high expressive and instrumental motivations and generally exhibit a large degree of autonomy in their vocational choices.

Funding information

Este artículo es fruto del proyecto de investigación «Elecciones educativas y desigualdades sociales en las biografías juveniles: acceso a la universidad, itine-rarios de Formación Profesional y abandono del sistema educativo», financiado por el Plan Nacional I+D (referencia CSO2016-79945-P).

Funders

Bibliographic References

  • Appleton, James J.; Christenson, Sandra L.; Furlong, Michael J. (2008). «Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct». Psychology in the Schools, 45 (5), 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20303
  • Archambault, Isabelle; Janosz, Michel; Fallu, Jean-Sébastian; Pagani, Linda S. (2009). «Student engagement and its relationship with early high school dropout». Journal of Adolescence, 32, 651-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.007
  • Bernardi, Fabrizio; Cebolla, Héctor (2014). «Previous School Results and Social Background: Compensation and Imperfect Information in Educational Transitions». European Sociological Review, 30 (2), 207-17. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jct029
  • Boudon, Raymond (1974). Education, Opportunity, and Social Inequality: Changing Prospects in Western Society. Nueva York: John Wiley & Sons Canada, Limited.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1988). La distinción. Criterios y bases sociales del gusto. Madrid: Taurus.
  • Casal, J.; Merino, R.; García, M. (2011). «Pasado y futuro del estudio sobre la transición de los jóvenes». Papers. Revista de Sociologia, 96 (4), 1139-1162.
  • Cerdà-Navarro, Antoni; Salvà-Mut, Francesca; Comas Forgas, Rubén (2019). «A typology of students in intermediate vocational education and training programmes based on student engagement factors, sociodemographic characteristics and intentions of dropping out». European Journal of Education, 00:1-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12361
  • Fernández-Enguita, Mariano (1988). «El rechazo escolar: ¿alternativa o trampa social?». Política y Sociedad, 1, 23-35.
  • Furlong, Andy; Biggart, Andy (1999). «Framing ‘choices’: a longitudinal study of occupational aspirations among 13 to 16 year-olds». Journal of Education and Work, 12 (1), 21-35.
  • Furlong, Andy; Cartmel, Fred; Biggart, Andy (2006). «Choice biographies and transitional linearity: re-conceptualising modern youth transitions». Papers. Revista de Sociologia, 79, 225-239.
  • Gambetta, Diego (1987). They push or they jump? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • García Gracia, M.; Merino, R. (2006). «Transición a la vida adulta: nuevas y viejas desigualdades en función del género». Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 113, 155-162.
  • Jackson, Michelle (ed.) (2013). Determined to Succeed?: Performance versus Choice in Educational Attainment. California: Stanford University Press.
  • Kuha, Jouni (2004). «AIC & BIC: Comparisons of Assumptions and Performance». Sociological Methods & Research, 33 (2), 189-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124103262065
  • Leibowitz, Arleen (1977). «Family background and economic success: a review of evidence». En: Taubman, Paul (ed.). Kinometrics: determinants of socioeconomic success between and within families. Ámsterdam: North Holland.
  • Marhuenda-Fluixá, Fernando; Salvà, Francesca; Navas, Almudena; Abiétar, Míriam (2015). «Twenty years of basic vocational education provision in Spain. Changes and trends». International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 2 (2), 137-151.
  • Martínez, J. S.; Merino, R. (2011). «Formación Profesional y desigualdad de oportunidades educativas por clase social y género». Témpora, 14, 13-37.
  • Merino, R. (2005). «Apuntes de historia de la Formación Profesional reglada en España». Témpora. Revista de Historia y Sociología de la Educación, 8, 211-236.
  • Merino, R.; Llosada, J. (2007). «¿Puede una reforma hacer que más jóvenes escojan Formación Profesional? Flujos e itinerarios de Formación Profesional de los jóvenes españoles». Témpora. Revista de Historia y Sociología de la Educación. 10, 215-244.
  • Musitu, Gonzalo; García, Fernando (2004). ESPA29: Escala de estilos de socialización parental en la adolescencia. Madrid: Tea.
  • Nielsen, Klaus (2016). «Engagement, conduct of life and dropouts in the Danish vocational education and training (VET) system». Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 68 (2), 198-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2015.1133694
  • Niittylahti, Satu; Annala, Johanna; Mäkinen, Marita (2019). «Student engagement at the beginning of vocational studies». Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 9 (1), 21-42. https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.199121
  • OECD (2012). Grade expectations. How Marks and Education Policies Shape Students’ Ambitions. PISA. París: OECD Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264187528-en
  • Otto, Hans-Uwe (ed.) (2015). Facing trajectories from school to work: towards a capability-friendly youth policy in Europe. Springer.
  • Planas, Jordi (2014). Adecuar la oferta de educación a la demanda de trabajo. ¿Es posible? Una crítica a los análisis «adecuacionistas» de la relación entre formación y empleo. Publicaciones ANUIES, col. Temas de Hoy, n. 32.
  • Planas, J.; Merino, R. «La formación profesional». En: ESPAÑA 2015. Situación Social. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 539-546.
  • Portes, Alejandro; Aparicio, Rosa; Haller, William (2016). Spanish Legacies: The Coming of Age of the Second Generation. Oakland: University of California Press.
  • Richez, Jean-Claude; Labadie, Francine; Linares, Chantal de (2012). «Youth empowerment» dans l’espace euroméditerranéen. París: INJEP.
  • Rumberger, Russell W.; Rotermund, Susan (2012). «The Relationship Between Engagement and High School Dropout». En: Christenson, Sandra (ed.). Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, 491-513. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
  • Termes, Andreu (2012). «La recuperación académica en la FP: alcance y potencialidades, riesgos y límites». RASE. Revista de Sociología de la Educación, 5 (1), 58-74.
  • Troiano, Helena; Torrents, Dani; Daza, Lidia (2019). «Compensation for poor performance through social background in tertiary education choices». Studies in Higuer Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1666262
  • Urrea-Solano, Maria E.; Fernández-Sogorb, Aitana; Aparicio-Flores, María del Pilar; Hernández Amorós, María J. (2018). «La cultura de género del alumnado de Formación Profesional en el ámbito laboral». Revista Infad de Psicología, 1, 23-32. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2018.n1.v2.1156
  • Woodman, Dan; Wyn, Johanna (2015). Youth and Generation. Rethinking change and inequality in the lives of young people. Londres: SAGE Publications.