Intentional or inadvertent fake news sharing? Fact-checking warnings and users’ interaction with social media content

  1. Alberto Isaac Ardèvol Abreu
  2. Patricia Adriana Delponti Macchione
  3. Carmen Rodríguez Wangüemert
El profesional de la información

ISSN: 1699-2407

Year of publication: 2020

Volume: 29

Issue: 5

Pages: 13

Type: Article

Export: RIS
DOI: 10.3145/epi.2020.sep.07 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor


The main social media platforms have been implementing strategies to minimize fake news dissemination. These include identifying, labeling, and penalizing –via news feed ranking algorithms– fake publications. Part of the rationale behind this approach is that the negative effects of fake content arise only when social media users are deceived. Once debunked, fake posts and news stories should therefore become harmless. Unfortunately, the literature shows that the effects of misinformation are more complex and tend to persist and even backfire after correction. Furthermore, we still do not know much about how social media users evaluate content that has been fact-checked and flagged as false. More worryingly, previous findings suggest that some people may intentionally share made up news on social media, although their motivations are not fully explained. To better understand users’ interaction with social media content identified or recognized as false, we analyze qualitative and quantitative data from five focus groups and a sub-national online survey (N = 350). Findings suggest that the label of ‘false news’ plays a role –although not necessarily central– in social media users’ evaluation of the content and their decision (not) to share it. Some participants showed distrust in fact-checkers and lack of knowledge about the fact-checking process. We also found that fake news sharing is a two-dimensional phenomenon that includes intentional and unintentional behaviors. We discuss some of the reasons why some of social media users may choose to distribute fake news content intentionally.

Bibliographic References

  • Allcott, Hunt; Gentzkow, Matthew (2017). “Social media and fake news in the 2016 election”. Journal of economic perspectives, v. 31, n. 2, pp. 211-36.
  • An, Jisun; Cha, Meeyoung; Gummadi, Krishna; Crowcroft, Jon (2011). “Media landscape in Twitter: a world of new conventions and political diversity”. In: Proceedings of the 5th International AAAI Conference on weblogs and social media (ICWSM), pp.18-25.
  • Bode, Leticia; Vraga, Emily K. (2018). “See something, say something: correction of global health misinformation on social media”. Health communication, v. 33, n. 9, pp. 1131-1140.
  • Brandtzaeg, Petter-Bae; Følstad, Asbjørn; Chaparro-Domínguez, María-Ángeles (2018). “How journalists and social media users perceive online fact-checking and verification services”. Journalism practice, v. 12, n. 9, pp. 1109-1129.
  • Chadwick, Andrew; Vaccari, Cristian; O’Loughlin, Ben (2018). “Do tabloids poison the well of social media? Explaining democratically dysfunctional news sharing”. New media & society, v. 20, n. 11, pp. 4255-4274.
  • Choi, Jounghwa; Yang, Myengja; Chang, Jeongheon J. C. (2009). “Elaboration of the hostile media phenomenon: the roles of involvement, media skepticism, congruency of perceived media influence, and perceived opinion climate”. Communication research, v. 36, n. 1, pp. 54-75.
  • Cohen, Geoffrey L.; Sherman, David K.; Bastardi, Anthony; Hsu, Lilian; McGoey, Michelle; Ross, Lee (2007). “Bridging the partisan divide: self-affirmation reduces ideological closed-mindedness and inflexibility in negotiation”. Journal of personality and social psychology, v. 93, n. 3, pp. 415-430.
  • DeVito, Michael A. (2017). “From editors to algorithms: a values-based approach to understanding story selection in the Facebook news feed”. Digital journalism, v. 5, n. 6, pp. 753-773.
  • Ecker, Ullrich K. H.; Lewandowsky, Stephan; Swire, Briony; Chang, Darren (2011). “Correcting false information in memory: manipulating the strength of misinformation encoding and its retraction”. Psychonomic bulletin & review, v. 18, n. 3, pp. 570-578.
  • Gadde, Vijaya; Derella, Matt (2020). “An update on our continuity strategy during Covid-19”. Twitter blog, April 1.
  • Geis, Florence L.; Moon, Tae H. (1981). “Machiavellianism and deception”. Journal of personality and social psychology, v. 41, n. 4 pp. 766-775.
  • Gil de Zúñiga, Homero; Jung, Nakwon; Valenzuela, Sebastián (2012). “Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation”. Journal of computer-mediated communication, v. 17, n. 3, pp. 319-336.
  • Giner-Sorolla, Roger; Chaiken, Shelly (1994). “The causes of hostile media judgments”. Journal of experimental social psychology, v. 30, n. 2, pp. 165-180.
  • Gunther, Richard; Beck, Paul, A.; Nisbet, Erik C. (2019). “Fake news and the defection of 2012 Obama voters in the 2016 presidential election”. Electoral studies, v. 61.
  • Hayes, Andrew F.; Cai, Li (2007). “Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: an introduction and software implementation”. Behavior research methods, v. 39, n. 4, pp. 709-722.
  • Hermida, Alfred; Fletcher, Fred; Korell, Darryl; Logan, Donna (2012). “Share, like, recommend”. Journalism studies, v. 13, n. 5-6, pp. 815-824.
  • Hern, Alex (2020a). “Twitter to remove harmful fake news about coronavirus”. The guardian, March 19.
  • Hern, Alex (2020b). “Fake coronavirus tweets spread as other sites take harder stance”. The guardian, March 4.
  • Ho, Jason Y. C.; Dempsey, Melany (2010). “Viral marketing: motivations to forward online content”. Journal of business research, v. 63, n. 9-10, pp. 1000-1006.
  • Lee, Chei-Sian; Ma, Long (2012). “News sharing in social media: the effect of gratifications and prior experience”. Computers in human behavior, v. 28, n. 2, pp. 331-339.
  • Lewandowsky, Stephan; Ecker, Ullrich K. H.; Cook, John (2017). “Beyond misinformation: understanding and coping with the ‘post-truth’ era”. Journal of applied research in memory and cognition, v. 6, n. 4, pp. 353-369.
  • Lewandowsky, Stephan; Ecker, Ullrich K. H.; Seifert, Colleen M.; Schwarz, Norbert; Cook, John (2012). “Misinformation and its correction: continued influence and successful debiasing”. Psychological science in the public interest, v. 13, n. 3, pp. 106-131.
  • (2020). “Coronavirus y paquetes procedentes de China: ¿cuánto dura el virus vivo en objetos?”., 12 abril.
  • Maldito bulo (2020). “No, ni Vox ha votado en contra de subir las pensiones y los salarios mínimos ni ha sido el único partido que se ha abstenido: BNG y la CUP también se abstuvieron”. Maldito bulo, 6 febrero.
  • Maldito bulo (2018). “Tres novedades en pruebas: servicio de WhatsApp, Bulobot de Facebook y verificador de imágenes”. Maldito bulo, Julio 18.
  • Maldita migración (2019). “No: rumanos, ecuatorianos y marroquíes no consumen 7 de cada 10 euros de la sanidad pública”. Maldita migración, 28 junio.
  • Marantz, Andrew (2019). “Facebook and the ‘free speech’ excuse”. The New Yorker. October 31.
  • Mena, Paul (2020). “Cleaning up social media: the effect of warning labels on likelihood of sharing false news on Facebook”. Policy & internet, v. 12, n. 2, pp. 165-183.
  • Mosseri, Adam (2019). “Bringing people closer together”. Facebook newsroom, January 11.
  • Mosseri, Adam (2016). “Addressing hoaxes and fake news”. Facebook newsroom, December 15.
  • Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Kalogeropoulos, Anthonis; Nielsen, Rasmus-Kleis (2019). Reuters Institute digital news report 2019. UK: Reuters Institute for the study of Journalism. University of Oxford. ISBN: 978 1 907384 61 5.
  • Newtral (2020). “Facebook califica de falsas las afirmaciones que vinculan el límite del reenvío en WhatsApp a los equipos de verificación”. Newtral, 13 abril.
  • Nielsen, Rasmus-Kleis; Graves, Lucas (2017). News you don’t believe: Audience perspectives on fake news. UK: Reuters Institute for the study of Journalism. University of Oxford.
  • Paul, Kari (2019). “Zuckerberg defends Facebook as bastion of ‘free expression’ in speech”. The guardian, October 17.
  • Pennycook, Gordon; Bear, Adam; Collins, Evan T.; Rand, David G. (2020). “The implied truth effect: attaching warnings to a subset of fake news headlines increases perceived accuracy of headlines without warnings”. Management science (ahead of print version), pp. 1-14.
  • Poynter Institute (n. d). International fact-checking network fact-checkers’ code of principles.
  • Rosen, Guy (2020). “An update on our work to keep people informed and limit misinformation about Covid-19”. Facebook newsroom, April 16.
  • Rosen, Guy; Harbath, Katie; Gleicher, Nathaniel; Leathern, Rob (2019). “Helping to protect the 2020 US elections”. Facebook newsroom, October 21.
  • Smith, Jeff; Jackson, Grace; Raj, Seetha (2018). “Designing against misinformation”. Medium, December 20.
  • Strickland, April A.; Taber, Charles S.; Lodge, Milton (2011). “Motivated reasoning and public opinion”. Journal of health politics, policy and law, v. 36, n. 6, pp. 935-944.
  • Taber, Charles S.; Lodge, Milton (2006). “Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs”. American journal of political science, v. 50, n. 3, pp. 755-769.
  • Twitter Safety (2020). “We know that some tweets include manipulated photos or videos […]”. Twitter, April 20.
  • Vosoughi, Soroush; Roy, Deb; Aral, Sinan (2018). “The spread of true and false news online”. Science, v. 359, n. 6380, pp. 1146-1151.
  • Walker, Mason; Gottfried, Jeffrey (2019). “Republicans far more likely than Democrats to say fact-checkers tend to favor one side”. Pew Research Center, June 27.
  • Weedon, Jen; Nuland, William; Stamos, Alex (2017). Information operations and Facebook. White paper, Facebook, April 27.
  • Wenzel, Andrea (2019). “To verify or to disengage: Coping with ‘fake news’ and ambiguity”. International journal of communication, v. 13, pp. 1977-1995.
  • Wong, Lorraine Y. C.; Burkell, Jacquelyn (2017). “Motivations for sharing news on social media”. In: Proceedings of the 8th International conference on social media & society, pp. 1-5.