Análisis cualitativo-funcional comparativo para el estudio de los procesos de gramaticalización en las construcciones progresivas del inglés

  1. Carlos van Arkel-Simón 1
  1. 1 Departamento de Filologías Extranjeras y sus Lingüísticas, UNED (España)
Journal:
Revista de Filología de la Universidad de La Laguna

ISSN: 0212-4130

Year of publication: 2019

Issue: 39

Pages: 71-94

Type: Article

More publications in: Revista de Filología de la Universidad de La Laguna

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

In this paper we examine comparatively the qualitative relations between the functional patterns of English progressive constructions in the course of their diachronic development and the grammaticalization processes undergone by these constructions. In order to illustrate these relations, we set out the qualitative-functional analysis of a number of progressive prototypes drawn from the family of corpora York-Toronto-Helsinki-Penn, specifically from the textual genres per period estimated to involve this type of grammatical change. We conduct an analysis on the basis of the host of features that characterise these constructions in present-day English which suggests the presence of three progressive gradients: a structural, a functional and a grammatical change gradient. In addition, the study demonstrates the existence of a relationship between subjectification processes experienced by progressive structures and primary grammaticalization phenomena, as well as between objectification phenomena and secondary grammaticalization processes.

Bibliographic References

  • Biber, Douglas (1988): Variation across Speech and Writing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Biber, Douglas et al. (1999): Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English, London: Longman.
  • Biber, Douglas y Edward Finegan (1997): «Diachronic Relations Among Speech-Based and Written Registers in English», en Terttu Nevalainen and Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, eds., To Explain the Present. Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen, Helsinki, Société Néophilologique, 253-275.
  • Denison, David (1993): English Historical Syntax: Verbal Constructions, New York: Longman.
  • Fisher, Olga (1992): «Syntax», en Norman Blake, ed., The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 207-408.
  • Fisher, Olga (2007): Morphosyntactic Change. Functional and Formal Perspectives, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Geisler, Christer (2002): «Investigating Register Variation in Nineteenth-Century English», en Randy Reppen, Susan M. Fitzmaurice y Douglas Biber, eds., Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 249-271.
  • Goedsche, C. Rudolf (1932): «The Terminate Aspect of the Expanded Form: Its Development and Its Relation to the Gerund», The Journal of English and Germanic Philology 31: 469-477.
  • Heine, Bernd y Tania Kuteva (2005): Language Contact and Grammatical Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Heine, Bernd y Mechthild Reh (1984): Grammaticalization and Reanalysis in African Languages, Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
  • Hübler, Axel (1998): The Expressivity of Grammar. Grammatical Devices Expressing Emotion across Time, Berlin: De Gruyter.
  • Huddleston, Rodney y Geoffrey K. Pullum (2002): The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jespersen, Otto (1931): A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Heidelberg: Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung.
  • Kranich, Svenja (2010): The Progressive in Modern English: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization and Related Changes, Amsterdam/New York: Rodolpi.
  • Kroch, Anthony y Ann Taylor (2000): Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English (PPCME2), 2.a edición, tercer lanzamiento, Departamento de Lingüística, Universidad de Pensilvania. Edición en CD-ROM.
  • Kroch, Anthony, Beatrice Santorini y Ariel Diertani (2004): Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English (PPCEME), 1.a edición, segundo lanzamiento, Departamento de Lingüística, Universidad de Pensilvania. Edición en CD-ROM.
  • Kroch, Anthony, Beatrice Santorini y Ariel Diertani (2010): The Penn Parsed Corpus of Modern British English (PPCMBE), 1.a edición, primer lanzamiento, Departamento de Lingüística, Universidad de Pensilvania. Edición en CD-ROM.
  • Lee, Seung-Ah (2007): «Ing Forms and the Progressive Puzzle: A Construction-based Approach to English Progressives», Journal of Linguistics 43: 153-195.
  • Leisi, Ernst (1974): «Die Progressive Form im Englischen», en Alfred Schopf, ed., Der Englische Aspekt, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 235-247.
  • Mair, Christian (2006): Twentieth-Century English: History, Variation, and Standarization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mitchell, Bruce (1976): «Some Problems Involving Old English Periphrases with BEON/WESAN and the Present Participle», Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 77: 478-491.
  • Mitchell, Bruce (1985): Old English Syntax, vols. 1 y 2, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Mossé, Ferdinand (1938): Histoire de la forme périphrastique être + participe présent en Germanique, Paris: C. Klincksiek.
  • Mustanoja, Tauno F. (1960): A Middle English Syntax. Part 1. Parts of Speech, Helsinki: Societé Néophilologique.
  • Nehls, Dietrich (1988): «On the Development of the Grammatical Category of Verbal Aspect in English», en Josef Klegraf and Dietrich Nehls, eds., Essays on the English Language and Applied Linguistics: On the Occasion of Gerhard Nickel’s 60th Birthday, Heidelberg: Julian Groos Verlag, 173-198.
  • Nickel, Gerhard (1966): Die Expanded Form im Altenglischen: Vorkommen, Funktion und Herkunft der Umschrebung «Beon/Wesan» + Partizip Präsens. Neumünster: Karl Wachholtz Verlag.
  • Núñez-Pertejo, Paloma (2004): The Progressive in the History of English with Special Reference to the Early Modern English Period: A Corpus-Based Study, München: LINCOM.
  • Pürschel, Heiner (1981): «Der Gebrauch der Progressiven Form im Gesprochenen Englisch», en Jurgen Esser and Axel Hübler, eds., Forms and Functions. Tübingen: Narr, 83-92.
  • Quirk, Randolph et al. (1985): A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, London: Longman.
  • Smitterberg, Erik (2005): The Progressive in 19th-Century English: A Process of Integration, Amsterdam/New York, Rodolpi.
  • Taylor, Ann et al. (2003): The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose (YCOE), 1.a edición, Departamento de Lingüística, Universidad de York, Oxford Text Archive. URL: http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~lang22/YcoeHome1.htm; 10/ 9/ 2018.
  • Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (1990): «From Less to More Situated in Language: The Unidirectionality of Semantic Change», en Sylvia Adamson, Vivien Law, Nigel Vincent y Susan Wright, eds., Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 496-517.
  • Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (1992): «Syntax», en Richard Hogg, ed., The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 168-289.
  • Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (2003): «Constructions in Grammaticalization», en Brian Joseph y Richard Janda, eds., The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Oxford: Blackwell, 624-647.