Desafío en el diseño de MOOCsincorporación de aspectos para la colaboración y la gamificación

  1. González González, Carina Soledad 1
  2. Collazos Ordóñez, César Alberto 2
  3. García, Roberto 3
  1. 1 Universidad de La Laguna
    info

    Universidad de La Laguna

    San Cristobal de La Laguna, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01r9z8p25

  2. 2 Universidad del Cauca
    info

    Universidad del Cauca

    Popayán, Colombia

    ROR https://ror.org/04fybn584

  3. 3 Universitat de Lleida
    info

    Universitat de Lleida

    Lleida, España

    ROR https://ror.org/050c3cw24

Show affiliations +
Journal:
RED: revista de educación a distancia

ISSN: 1578-7680

Year of publication: 2016

Issue Title: Presente y futuro, en Latinoamérica, de la enseñanza en entornos virtuales y del aprendizaje en entornos conectados.

Issue: 48

Type: Article

DOI: 10.6018/RED/48/7 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: RED: revista de educación a distancia

Abstract

Nowadays, there is a great variety of Massive Online Open Courses (MOOCs) offered by different provides, such as MiriadaX, Coursera, or edX. They are materialized using different elements (speaks like TEDx, digital textbooks or educative TV programs), which are designed and developed by an instructor as part of a series of digital videos. Videos are then made available to the students that will access them. However, the ideal situation is that MOOCs motivate collaboration processes involving both teachers and students, who participate in the design of the courses so they can more effectively use these courses. To achieve this, the challenge is to incorporate collaboration aspects into MOOCs. This is not an easy task because it requires the design and organization of activities that motivate the collaboration among participants. Likewise, the motivational aspects are necessary to avoid courses dropout and favor learning. To this end, it is important to consider some gamification techniques that might be determinant to motivate learning. In this line, the proposal is the inclusion of collaboration and gamification techniques during MOOCs planning, design, implementation and use. This is integrated into a proposed technological architecture that facilitates ubiquitouslearning, the Training and Learning Architecture (TLA).

€ View funding

Funding information

Este trabajo ha sido parcialmente financiado por el Proyecto de Investigación CYTED, ref. 513RT0481 "Red Iberoamericana de Apoyo a los Procesos de Enseñanza-Aprendizaje de Competencias Profesionales a través de Entornos Ubicuos y Colaborativos (U-CSCL)" y al proyecto español InDAGuS (TIN2012-37826-C02).

Funders

  • Proyecto de Investigación CYTED Spain
    • 513RT0481
    • TIN2012-37826-C02

Bibliographic References

  • Belanger, V., & Thornton, J. (2013), Bioelectricity: A Quantitative Approach Duke University’s First MOOC. Recuperado de: http://hdl.handle.net/10161/6216
  • Blake, D. (2013). From MOOC to DOCC: New Directions in Open Online Education. Recuperado de: http://moocs.com/index.php/from-mooc-to-docc-new-directions-in-open-online-education/
  • Blom, J., Verma, H., Li, N., Skevi, A., &Dillenbourg, P. (2013). MOOCs are More Social than You Believe. eLearning Papers, 33. Recuperado de http://www.elearningpapers.eu
  • Borras O., Martínez M. &Fidalgo A. (2014). Gamification in MOOC: challenges, opportunities and proposals for advancing MOOC model. ACM Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM '14).Salamanca. Spain. DOI: 10.1145/2669711.2669902.
  • Chang, J. W., & Wei, H. Y. (2015). Exploring Engaging Gamification Mechanics in Massive Online Open Courses. ISSN 1436-4522 (online) and 1176-3647 (print). Journal of Educational Technology & Society.
  • Collazos, C., et al. (2002). An Influence Factor in the Collaborative Work Process.Proceedings of 4th International Conference on New Educational Environment, ICNEE 2002, Lugano, Suiza. May 2002, pp. 7-10.
  • Collazos, C., González, C., y García, R. (2014). Computer Supported Collaborative MOOCs: CSCM. En Proceedings of the 2014 Workshop on Interaction Design in Educational Environments, ACM, pp. 28-33, ISBN: 978-1-4503-3034-3.
  • Collazos C. et al. (2014). Patterns for Monitoring and Evaluating Collaborative Learning Processes in Videogames. Ed. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, ISBN: 978-3-659-53155-2.
  • Collazos C. et al. (2007). Evaluating Collaborative Learning Processes using System based Measurement. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10, 257-274.
  • Corbi, A., & Burgos, D. (2014).Review of current student-monitoring techniques used in elearning-focused recommender systems and learning analytics. The Experience API & LIME model. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence. Recuperado de http://www.ijimai.org/journal/sites/default/files/files/2014/09/ijimai20142_7_6_pdf_27449.pdf
  • Coughlan, S., (2013). Harvard plans to boldly go with 'Spocs'. Recuperado en enero 7, 2016, de http://etcjournal.com/2013/09/26/spocs-are-mooc-game-changers/
  • Chauhan. A. (2014). Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCS): Emerging Trends un Assessment and Accreditation. En: Digital Education Review, 25, 7-17. Recuperado de http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/der/article/view/11325 en enero 7, 2016.
  • Cruz-Benito, J. et al. (2015).Extending MOOC ecosystemsusing web services and software architectures. En P. Ponsa, J. A. Román, & D. Guasch (Eds.), Actas del XVI Congreso Internacional de Interacción Persona‐Ordenador. Interacción 2015 (Vilanova i la Geltrú, Barcelona, España, 7 al 9 de Septiembre de 2015) (pp. 438-444).
  • Daniel J. (2012). Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. 3, 18-38. doi:10.5334/2012
  • Del Blanco, A., et al. (2013). E-Learning standards and learning analytics. Can data collection be improved by using standard data models? En 2013 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1255–1261). IEEE. doi:10.1109/EduCon.2013.6530268
  • De-Marcos, L.et al. (2014). An empirical study comparing gamification and social networking on e-learning. Computers & Education, 75, 82-91.
  • Dillenbourg P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning?. P. Dillenbourg. Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches., Oxford: Elsevier, pp.1-19, 1999.
  • Downes, S. (2013). Connective Knowledge and Open Resources. Recuperado de http://halfanhour.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/connective-knowledge-and-open-resources.html
  • González, C., Mora, A. & Toledo, P. (2014). Gamification in intelligent tutoring systems. En Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 221-225. DOI=10.1145/2669711.2669903. Recuperado de http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2669711.2669903. Pages 221-225
  • González, C. & Mora A. (2015). Técnicas de gamificación aplicadas en la docencia de Ingeniería Informática. RevistaReVisión. Vol 8, No 1. Recuperado de http://bit.ly/1PvpeRT
  • Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, K.A. (2006). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina: Interaction Book Company.
  • Johnson, R.T., & Johnson, D.W. (1986). Cooperative learning in the science classroom. Science and children, 24, 31-32. Recuperado de http://bit.ly/1z5tYTh
  • Kagan, S. (1990). Cooperative Learning for Learners Limited in Language Proficiency. En M. Brubacher, R. Payne, & K. Rickett (Eds.), Perspectives on Small Group Learning (pp. 202-223). Oakville: Rubicon Publishing Inc.
  • Kirkpatrick, D.L., & Kirkpatrick, J.D. (2007). Implementing the Four Levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  • Kinash, S. (2013). MOOCing about MOOCs. Education Technology Solutions, 57, 56 58. Recuperado de http://bit.ly/1YQw596
  • Kolowich, S., & Newman, J. (2013). The minds behind the MOOCs. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Recuperado de http://chronicle.com/article/The-Professors Behind-the-MOOC/137905/
  • Larry, C. (2012). MOOCs and Pedagogy: Teacher-Centered, Student-Centered, and Hybrids. Recuperado de http://larrycuban.wordpress.com/2013/02/13/moocs-and-pedagogy-part-2/
  • Lewir, T. (2013). After Setbacks, Online Courses Are Rethought. The New York Times. Recuperado de http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/11/us/after-setbacks-online-courses-are-rethought.html
  • Liyanagunawardena, T., Williams, S. & Adams, A. (2013). The Impact and Reach of MOOCs: A Developing Countries’ Perspective. eLearning Papers, 33. Recuperado de http://www.elearningpapers.eu
  • McAuley, A. et al. (2010). The MOOC model for digital practice. Recuperado de: http://davecormier.com/edblog/wp-content/uploads/MOOC_Final.pdf
  • Morrison, D. (2013). How Collaborative Learning Works in Closed Online Courses vs. MOOCs. Online Learning Insight Blog. Recuperado de: http://onlinelearninginsights.wordpress.com/2013/02/20/how-does-collaborative-learning-work-in-closed-online-courses-vs-moocs/
  • Pappano, L., (2012). The Year of the MOOC. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html
  • Poltrack J. et al. (2012). The Next Generation of SCORM: Innovation for the Global Force. Paper presented at the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation & Education Conference (I/ITSEC).
  • Regan, D. (2013). The Training and Learning Architecture: Infrastructure for the Future of Learning. XV Simposio Internacional de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones en la Educación (SINTICE 2013).
  • Reigeluth, C. (2012). Teoría instruccional y tecnología para el nuevo paradigma de la educación. RED, Revista de Educación a Distancia. Número 32. 30 de septiembre de 2012.Consultado el 16/05/13 en http://www.um.es/ead/red/32
  • Romero, M. & Usart, M. (2013).Serious Games Integration in an Entrepreneurship Massive Online Open Course (MOOC). In Serious Games Development and Applications (pp. 212-225). Heidelberg: Springer Berlin.
  • Shah, D. (2015). MOOCs in 2015: Breaking Down the Numbers. Consultado el 28/12/2015 en: https://www.edsurge.com/news/2015-12-28-moocs-in-2015-breaking-down-the-numbers.
  • Soller, A. (2001). Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), 12, 40-62. Recuperado de: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00197321/
  • Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., &Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R.K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409-426). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Steenkamp, A. & González C. (2011).Special Issue on Service-oriented Software Engineering: Foundations, Architectures, SDLCs and Innovative Applications. International Journal of Information Technologies and the Systems Approach (IJITSA). Recuperado de: http://www.igi-global.com/Files/Ancillary/1935-570X_4_1_Preface2.pdf
  • Totten, S., et al. (1991). Cooperative learning: A guide to Research. New York: Garland.
  • Wenger, E. (2009). A social theory of learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning (pp. 209-218). New York: Routledge.
  • Werbach, K. (2012). For the Win: How Game Thinking Can Revolutionize Your Business. Wharton: Wharton Digital Press.
  • Yuan, L., & Powell S. (2013). MOOCs and Open Education: Implications for Higher Education. Retrievedfrom: http://publications.cetis.ac.uk/2013/667
  • Zapata-Ros, M. (2014) Los MOOC en la crisis de la Educación Universitaria. Docencia, diseñoyaprendizaje. Amazon.
  • Zichermann, G., & Cunningham, C. (2011). Gamification by Design: Implementing Game Mechanics in Web and Mobile Apps. Sebastopol, California: O'Reilly Media.
Data source: Dialnet