Analysis of the critical attitude of university social sciences students toward the use of computing software

  1. Celina Pestano Gabino 1
  2. Concepción Nieves González Concepción 1
  3. María Candelaria Gil Fariña 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Laguna
    info

    Universidad de La Laguna

    San Cristobal de La Laguna, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01r9z8p25

Journal:
RELIME. Revista latinoamericana de investigación en matemática educativa

ISSN: 1665-2436

Year of publication: 2021

Volume: 24

Issue: 1

Pages: 35-60

Type: Article

DOI: 10.12802/RELIME.21.2412 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: RELIME. Revista latinoamericana de investigación en matemática educativa

Metrics

Cited by

  • Scopus Cited by: 0 (22-11-2023)
  • Web of Science Cited by: 0 (13-10-2023)
  • Dimensions Cited by: 0 (10-04-2023)

JCR (Journal Impact Factor)

  • Year 2021
  • Journal Impact Factor: 0.333
  • Journal Impact Factor without self cites: 0.333
  • Article influence score: 0.197
  • Best Quartile: Q4
  • Area: EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Quartile: Q4 Rank in area: 264/270 (Ranking edition: SSCI)

SCImago Journal Rank

  • Year 2021
  • SJR Journal Impact: 0.179
  • Best Quartile: Q4
  • Area: Education Quartile: Q4 Rank in area: 1095/1441

CIRC

  • Social Sciences: B

Scopus CiteScore

  • Year 2021
  • CiteScore of the Journal : 0.7
  • Area: Education Percentile: 24

Journal Citation Indicator (JCI)

  • Year 2021
  • Journal Citation Indicator (JCI): 0.13
  • Best Quartile: Q4
  • Area: EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Quartile: Q4 Rank in area: 646/743

Dimensions

(Data updated as of 10-04-2023)
  • Total citations: 0
  • Recent citations: 0
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR): 0.0

Abstract

This research is in the context of university mathematics education for social sciences students, in particular, in the fields of economics, business, accounting and finance. It arises from the observed deficiency in the training of students that leads them to trust the accuracy of results obtained through any specialized and widely recognized mathematical software. Some of them know that the software can be mistaken, however they believe that it will only occur in exercises at a far higher level than that affecting them, meaning those involving strictly scientific areas. The research confirms that this blind trust is true, and justifies why they should have a critical attitude toward the use of software at any level. It also provides one of multiple answers to the question that some of them ask: Why devote class time to the methods and certain steps in the algorithms if the computer can solve the exercises?