La incorporación de las ideas al análisis de políticas públicas en el marco de las coaliciones promotoras

Bibliographic References

• Baumgartner, F. R. y Jones, B. D. (1993), Agendas and Instability in American Politics, Chicago y Londres, The University of Chicago Press.
• Braun, D. y Busch, A. (eds.) (1999), Public Policy and Political Ideas, Northampton, Edward Elgar.
• Caplan, N. S.; Morrison, A. y Stambaugh, R. J. (1975), The Use of Social Science Knowledge on Policy Decisions at the National Level, Ann Arbor, Institute for Social Research.
• Converse, P. E. (1964), “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics”, en D. E. Apter (ed.), Ideology and Discontent, Nueva York, Free Press.
• Dunn, W. (1980), “The Two-Communties Metaphor and Models of Knowledge Use”, en Knowledge, 1, junio, pp. 515-536.
• Fenger, M. y Klok, P. (2001), “Interdependency, Beliefs, and Coalition Behavior: A Contribution to the Advocacy Coalition Framework”, en Policy Sciences, 34, pp. 157-170.
• Fischer, F. y Forester, J. (1993), The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, Durham y Londres, Duke University Press.
• Hall, P. A. (ed.) (1989), The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism Across Nations, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
• Hall, P. A. (1993), “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State. The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain”, en Comparative Politics, 25, 3, pp. 275-296.
• Heclo, H. (1974), Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden. From Relief to Income Maintenance, New Haven y Londres, Yale University Press.
• Heclo, H. (1978), “Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment”, en A. King (ed.): The New American Political System, Washington, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
• Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1982), “Professional Roles for Policy Analysts: A Critical Analysis”, en Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2, Fall, pp. 88-100.
• Jenkins-Smith, H. C. y Sabatier, P. A. (1993a), “The Study of Public Policy Process”, en P. A. Sabatier y H. C. Jenkins-Smith (eds.), Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, Boulder, Westview Press.
• Jenkins-Smith, H. C. y Sabatier, P. A. (1993b), “The Dynamics of Policy-Oriented Learning”, en P. A. Sabatier y H. C. Jenkins-Smith (eds.), Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, Boulder, Westview Press.
• Jenkins-Smith, H. C. y G. K. St. Clair (1993), “The Politics of Offshore Energy: Empirically Testing the Advocacy Coalition Framework”, en P. A. Sabatier y H. C. Jenkins-Smith, (eds.), Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, Boulder, Westview Press.
• Jenkins-Smith, H. C. y D. Weimer (1985), “Analysis as Retrograde Action”, en Public Administration Review, 45, julio, pp. 485-494.
• Jobert, B. y Muller, P. (1987), L’Etat en action, París, PUF.
• John, P. (2000), Analysing Public Policy, Londres y Nueva York, Continuum.
• Kahneman, D.; Slovic, P.; y Tversky, A. (1982), Judgment Under Uncertainty, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Kingdon, J. (1984), Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Boston, Little Brown.
• Küebler, D. (1999), “Ideas as Catalytic Elements for Policy Change: Advocacy Coalitions and Drug Policy in Switzerland”, en D. Braun y A. Busch (eds.), The Public Policy and Political Ideas, Northampton, Edward Elgar.
• Küebler, D. (2000), Politique de la drogue dans les villes suisses entre ordre et santé. Analyse des conflits de mise en oevre, París, L’Hamartan.
• Majone, G. (1980), “Policies as theories”, en Omega, 8, pp. 151-162.
• Majone, G. (1997), Evidencia, argumentación y persuasión en la formulación de políticas,México, Colegio Nacional de Ciencias Políticas y Administración Pública y Fondo de Cultura Económica.
• March, J. y Simon, H. (1958), Organizations, Nueva York, Wiley.
• Meltsner, A. (1976), Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy, Berkeley, University of California Press.
• Muller, P. (1995), “La politique publique comme construction d’un rapport au monde”, en A. Foure. G. Pollet y P. Warin (eds.), La construction du sens dans les politiques publiques. Debats autour de la notion de référentiel, París, L’Hamartan.
• Nelson, R. (1987), “The Economics Profession and the Making of Public Policy”, en Journal of Economic Literature, 25, marzo, pp. 42-84.
• Nisbet, R. y Ross, L. (1980), Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.
• Pressman, J. y Wildawsky, A. (1973/1998), Implementation, Berkeley, University of California Press. [Traducido como Implementación. Cómo grandes expectativas concebidas en Washington se frustran en Oakland, México, Colegio Nacional de Ciencias Políticas y Administración Pública, A. C. y Fondo de Cultura Económica.]
• Putnam, R. (1973), The Beliefs of Politicians, New Haven,Yale University Press.
• Quattrone, G. y Tverky, A. (1988), “Contrasting Rational and Psychological Analysis of Political Choice”, en American Political Science Review, 83, septiembre, pp. 719-736.
• Rein, M. y White, S. (1977), “Policy Research: Belief and Doubt”, en Policy Analysis, 3, primavera, pp. 239-271.
• Sabatier, P. A. (1984), “Faculty Interest in Policy-Oriented Advising and Research”, Knowledge, 5, junio, pp. 469-502.
• Sabatier, P. A. (1987), “Knowledge, Policy-Oriented Learning, and Policy Change”, en Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 8, pp. 649-692.
• Sabatier, P. A. (1988), “An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning”, en Policy Sciences, 21, pp. 129-168.
• Sabatier, P. A. (1993), “Policy Change over a Decade or More”, en P. A Sabatier y H. C. JenkinsSmith (eds.) (1993), Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, Boulder, Westview Press.
• Sabatier, P. A. (1998), “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Revisions and Relevance for Europe”, en Journal of European Public Policy, 5, 1, pp. 93-130.
• Sabatier, P. A. (ed.) (1999), Theories of Policy Process, Boulder, Westview Press.
• Sabatier, P. A. y Hunter, S. (1989), “The Incorporation of Casual Perceptions into Models of Elite Belief Systems”, en The Western Political Quarterly, 42, 3, pp. 229-261.
• Sabatier, P. A. ; Hunter, S. y McLaughlin, S. (1987), “The Devil Shift: Perceptions and Misperceptions of Opponents”, en Western Political Quarterly, 41, septiembre, pp. 449-476.
• Sabatier, P. A. y Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (eds.) (1993), Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, Boulder, Westview Press.
• Sabatier, P. A. y Jenkins-Smith. H. C. (1999), “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment”, en P. A. Sabatier (ed.),Theories of Policy Process, Boulder, Westview Press.
• Sabatier, P. A. y Pelkey, Neil (1987), “Incorporating Multiple Actors and Guidance Instruments into Models of Regulatory Policy-Making: an Advocacy Coalition Framework”, en Administration and Society, 19, septiembre, pp. 236-263.
• Schlager, E. (1995), “Policy Making and Collective Action: Defining Coalitions within the Advocacy Coalition Framework”, en Policy Sciences, 28, pp. 242-270.
• Schlager, E. y Blomquist, W. (1996), “A Comparison of Three Emerging Theories of the Policy Process”, en Political Research Quarterly, 49, septiembre, pp. 651-672.
• Surel, Y. (1995), “Les politiques publiques comme paradigms”, en A. Foure. G. Pollet y P. Warin (eds.), La construction du sens dans les politiques publiques. Debats autour de la notion de référentiel, París, L’Hamartan.
• Webber, D. (1983), “Obstacles to the Utilization of Systematic Policy Analysis”, en Knowledge, 4, junio, pp. 534-560.
• Weiss, C. (1977a), Using Social Research in Public Policy Making, Lexington, D.C. Heath.
• Weiss, C. (1977b), “Research for Policy’s Sake: The Enlightment Function of Social Research”, en Policy Analysis, 3, otoño, pp. 531-545.
• Zafonte, M. y Sabatier, P. A. (1998), “Shared Beliefs and Functional Interdependence as Determinants of Ally Networks in Overlapping subsystems”, en Journal of Theoretical Politics, 10, 4, pp. 473-505.