Toma de decisión en una tarea simulada de control de procesos

  1. Gladys Rolo González
  2. María Dolores Díaz Cabrera
Journal:
Revista de psicología del trabajo y de las organizaciones = Journal of work and organizational psychology

ISSN: 1576-5962

Year of publication: 2000

Volume: 16

Issue: 1

Pages: 23-44

Type: Article

Export: RIS

Abstract

This research is framed within the context of a naturalistic decision-making approach.Specifically, our objectives were: first, to evaluate how people generate a decision-actionprocess in a task; second, to identify if some characteristics related with naturalistic decision-making are present in the study participants; and third, to examine the influence of verbaland spatial aptitudes. For these objectives, a patient temperature regulation system was selectedas the simulated task that measured body temperature, blood pressure and red blood cellcount. We took into account the characteristics of complex environments. Performance simulated task was evaluated in seventy-seven participants selected from scores obtained from verbal comprehension and visualization tests. The results indicate some characteristics of a succesful performance such as the importance of information searches; the taking into account of delays in the effects of the actions; the anticipation of possible system changes. However, our results only indicate some relationships between spatial aptitude and task simulated performances.

Bibliographic References

  • Anderson, J.R. (1980/1995). Cognitive Psychology and its implications. Fourth edition. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.
  • Beach, L.R. (1993). Image theory: Personal and organizational decisions. En G.A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, y C.E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods (pp. 148- 157). New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Co.
  • Brehmer, B. (1993). Cognitive aspects of safety. En B. Wilpert y T. Quale (Eds.), Reliability and Safety in Hazardous Work Systems. Approaches to analysis and design (pp.23-42). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Brehmer, B. y Allard, R. (1991). Dynamic decision making: the effects of task complexity and feedback delay. En J. Rasmussen, B. Brehmer y J. Leplat (Eds.), Distributed Decision Making. Cognitive Models for Cooperative Work. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E. y Pruitt, J.S. (1996). Establishing the boundaries of a paradigm for decision-making research. Human Factors, 38 (2), 193-205.
  • De Vega, M. (1984). Introducción a la psicología cognitiva. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
  • Dörner, D. (1990). The logic of failure. En D.E. Broadbent, A. Baddeley y J.T. Reason (Eds.), Human Factors in Hazardous Situations (pp. 463-473). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Dörner, D. y Schaub, H. (1994). Errors in planning and decision-making and the nature of human information processing. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 43 (4), 433-453.
  • Dunnette, M.D. (1976). Aptitudes, abilities and skills. En M.D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 473-520). Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company.
  • Egan, D. E. (1988). Individual differences in human-computer interaction. En M. Helander (Ed.), Handbook of HumanComputer Interaction. New York: NorthHolland.
  • Ekstrom, R.B., French, J.W., Harman, H.H. y Dermen, D. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. New Jersey: Educational Testing Service.
  • Endsley, M.R. (1997). The role of situation awareness in naturalistic decision making. En C. E. Zsambok y G. Klein (Eds.), Naturalistic Decision Making (pp. 269- 283). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Hollnagel, E. (1993). Human Reliability Analysis. Context and Control. Londres: Academic Press.
  • Kaempf, G.L. y Orasanu, J. (1997). Current and future applications of naturalistic decision making in aviation. En C. E. Zsambok y G. Klein (Eds.), Naturalistic Decision Making (pp. 81-90). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Landeweerd, J.A. (1979). Internal representation of a process: fault diagnosis and fault correction. Ergonomics, 12, 1343-1362.
  • León, O.G., Rueda, R. y Vega, M.A. (1988). Personalidad, diferencias individuales y decisión con riesgo. Estudios de Psicología, 36, 73-94.
  • Lipshitz, R. (1993). Converging themes in the study of decision making in realistic settings. En G.A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, y C.E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods (pp.103-137). New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Co.
  • March, J.G. y Simon, H.A. (1980). Teoría de la Organización. Barcelona: Editorial Ariel.(Orig. 1961).
  • Mayer, R.E. y Sims, V.K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words?. Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, (3), 389- 401.
  • Orasanu, J. y Connolly, T. (1993). The reinvention of decision making. En G.A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, y C.E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods (pp.3-20). New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Co.
  • PMA. Aptitudes mentales primarias (1979). Madrid: TEA Ediciones, S.A.
  • Quijano de Arana, S.D. (1993). La Psicología Social en las Organizaciones: fundamentos. Barcelona: PPU.
  • Rolo, G. (1996). Toma de decisión en control de procesos. Influencia del contexto y de factores individuales. Tesis doctoral no publicada, Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife.
  • Rolo, G. y Cabrera, D. (en prensa). Features of decision-making in process control tasks: the relevance of the work context. Cognitive, Technology and Work.
  • Roth, E.M., Woods, D.D. y Pople, H.E. Jr. (1992) Cognitive simulation as a tool for cognitive task analysis. Ergonomics, 3 (10), 1163-1198.
  • Zsambok, C.E. (1997). Naturalistic decision making: where are we now?. En C. E. Zsambok y G. Klein (Eds.), Naturalistic Decision Making (pp.3-16). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.