Calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (CVRS) en niños de educación primaria de Islas Canarias que usan dispositivos auditivos

  1. Olga María Alegre de La Rosa 1
  2. Luis Miguel Villar Angulo 2
  1. 1 Didáctica e Investigación Educativa, Facultad de Educación, Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, España
  2. 2 Didáctica y Organización Escolar, Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, España
Revista:
Revista de logopedia, foniatría y audiología

ISSN: 0214-4603

Año de publicación: 2020

Volumen: 40

Número: 2

Páginas: 55-66

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.RLFA.2019.11.004 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de logopedia, foniatría y audiología

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Introduction The objectives of the study were first, to evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of primary school children from the Canary Islands with cochlear implants (CIs) and hearing aids (HAs). And second, to analyse parents’ perceptions of their children with CIs and HAs regarding HRQoL, and finally, to explore the agreement between the children's self-reports and their parents’ reports concerning HRQoL. Material and methods Data consisted of 89 children with CIs and 63 children with HAs and their 152 parents. Two standardised instruments were used: Kid-KINDLR_children_7-13, Kid_Kiddo-KINDLR_Parents_ 7-17 and a demographic and audiological survey, which were answered by the children and their parents. Student's t-test, one-way ANOVA, post hoc analysis and 3 concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) were used to address the 3 objectives. Results and discussion The children with CIs exhibited a perception of better HRQoL in comparison with the children with HAs. The children with CIs and HAs and their parents were significantly distinct in the provinces of Tenerife and Gran Canaria. The cchildren with CIs and HAs from Gran Canaria were better on Emotional well-being and Family, while the children with CIs and HAs from Tenerife emphasised Self-esteem or Friends. The parents of the children with CIs had a higher average score in the perception of the total HRQoL and per dimension related to their children compared to the parents of the children with HAs. The agreement between children and parents was low except in the Self-esteem dimension. The children with CIs and their parents demonstrated a perception of better HRQoL than the children with HAs and their parents. The children with CIs and HAs had lower self-perception of the HRQoL than their parents’ reports. Conclusions The findings suggest that the children with CIs and HAs in Primary Education in the Canary Islands have discrepant perceptions of their HRQoL; the children with CIs self-perceive better HRQoL than the children with HAs. The parents of the children with CIs achieved a higher average score of their children's HRQoL than the parents of the children with HAs due to their belonging to a province. Professionals working with CI and HA recipients need to be sensitive to psychological issues to optimise HRQoL dimensions in children with CIs and HAs.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alegre, O. M., Rodríguez, M. C., Villar, L. M. y Pérez, D. (2016). Evaluación de la eficacia del implante coclear en función de la edad de implantación. European Scientific Journal, 12, 42-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n26p42
  • Alegre, O. M. y Villar, L. M. (2019). Relación entre los problemas emocionales y el desarrollo del lenguaje en ninos ˜ y adolescentes con dificultades auditivas. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 17, 5-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.15366/reice2019.17.1.001
  • Bruin, M. (2018). Parental involvement in children’s learning: The case of cochlear implantation--parents as educators? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62, 601-616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1258728
  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominarl scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
  • Cummins, R. A. (2005). Moving from the quality of life concept to a theory. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 699-706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00738.x
  • Edwards, L., Hill, T. y Mahon, M. (2012). Quality of life in children and adolescents with cochlear implants and additional needs. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 76, 851-857. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.02.057
  • Exenberger, S. y Juen, B. (2014). Well-being resilience and quality of life from children’s perspectives. A contextualized approach. Dordrecht: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7519-0
  • Freeman, V., Pisoni, D. B., Kronenberger, W. G. y Castellanos, I. (2017). Speech intelligibility and psychosocial functioning in deaf children and teens with cochlear implants. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 22, 278-289, http://doi:10.1093/deafed/enx001.
  • González, V. y Domínguez, A. B. (2019). Lectura, ortografía y habilidades fonológicas de estudiantes sordos con y sin implante coclear. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología, 39, 49-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rlfa.2018.07.001 Haukedal, C. L., von Koss, J., Lyxell, B. y Wie, O. B. (2018).
  • Parents’ perception of health-related quality of life in children with cochlear implants: The Impact of language skills and hearing. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 61, 2084-2098. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2018 JSLHR-H-17-0278
  • Hintermair, M., Sarimski, K. y Lang, M. (2017). Preliminary evidence assessing social-emotional competences in deaf and hard of hearing infants and toddlers using a new parent questionnaire. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 22, 143-154, http://doi: 10.1093/deafed/enw070.
  • Hoffman, M. F., Cejas, I. y Quittner, A. L. (2018). Health-related quality of life instruments for children with cochlear implants: Development of child and parent-proxy measures. Ear & Hearing, XX, 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD. 0000000000000631
  • Hoppe, U. y Hesse, G. (2017). Hearing aids: Indications, technology, adaptation, and quality control. German Society of Oto-RhinoLaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, 16, 1-24, http://doi: 10.3205/cto000147.
  • Hornsby, B. W. Y., Werfel, K., Camarata, S. y Bess, F. H. (2014). Subjective fatigue in children with hearing loss: Some preliminary findings. American Journal of Audioogy, 23, 129-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1059-0889(2013/13-0017
  • Huttunen, K., Rimmanen, S., Vikman, S., Virokannas, N., Sorri, M., Archbold, S. y Lutman, M. E. (2009). Parents’ views on the quality of life of their children 2-3 years after cochlear implantation. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 73, 1786-1794. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.09.038
  • Jardine, J., Glinianaia, S. V., McConachie, H., Embleton, N. D. y Rankin, J. (2014). Self-Reported Quality of Life of Young Children with Conditions from Early Infancy: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics, 134(4), e1129-e1148, https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-0352.
  • Karimi, M. y Brazier, J. (2016). Health health-related quality of life, and quality of life: What is the difference? Pharmaeconomics, 34, 645-649. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0389-9
  • Kumar, R., Warner-Czyz, A., Silver, C. H., Loy, B. y Tobey, E. (2015). American parent perspectives on quality of life in pediatric cochlear implant recipients. Ear & Hearing, 36, 269-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD. 0000000000000108
  • Lee, Y. C., Yang, H. J., Chen, V. C., Lee, W. T., Teng, M. J., Lin, C. H. y Gossop, M. (2016). Meta-analysis of quality of life in children and adolescents with ADHD: By both parent proxy-report and child self-report using PedsQLTM. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 51-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.11.009
  • Munoz, K., Rusk, S. E. P., Nelson, L., Preston, E., White, K. R., Barrett, T. S. y Twohig, M. P. (2016). Pediatric hearing aid management: Parent-reported needs for learning support. Ear & Hearing, 37, 703-709. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD. 0000000000000338
  • Navarro, J. S. y Merino, C. (2016). Estructura latente del Kiddo-Kindl en una muestra peruana. LIBERABIT: Lima (Perú), 22, 77-89.
  • Necula, V., Cosgarea, M. y Necula, S. E. (2013). Health-related quality of life in cochlear implanted patients in Romania. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 77, 216-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.10.026
  • Neumann, S., Salm, S., Rietz, Ch. y Stenneken, P. (2017). The German focus on the outcomes of communication under six (FOCUS-G): Reliability and validity of a novel assessment of communicative participation. Journal of Speech Language, and Hearing Research, 60, 675-681. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2016 JSLHR-L-15-0219
  • Organización Mundial de la Salud (1948). Constitución de la Organización Mundial de la Salud [documento en línea] [consultado 15 Mar 2019]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/governance/eb/who constitution sp.pdf.
  • Orgilés, M., Melero, S., Penosa, P., Espada, J. P. y Morales, A. (2018). Calidad de vida relacionada con la salud informada por los padres en preescolares espanoles: ˜ propiedades psicométricas del Kiddy-KINDL-R. Anales de Pediatría, 90(5), 237-271, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpedi.2018.04.019.
  • Pardo, M. J., Martínez, M., Notario, B., Solera Sánchez, M. y Martinez, V. (2015). Self-reports versus parental perceptions of health-related quality of life among deaf children and adolescents. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 20, 275-282, http://doi:10.1093/deafed/env018.
  • Punch, R. y Hyde, M. (2011). Social participation of children and adolescents with cochlear implants: A qualitative analysis of parent, teacher, and child interviews. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16, 474-493, http://doi:10.1093/deafed/enr001.
  • Ravens-Sieberer, U. y Bullinger, M. (2000). Questionnaire for measuring health-related quality of life in children and adolescents. Revised version.,. Manual [en línea] [consultado 1 May 2019]. Disponible en: https://www.kindl.org/english/information/.
  • Razafimahefa, T., Farinetti, A., Nicollas, R., Triglia, J. M., Roman, S. y Anderson, L. (2016). Auto- et hétéroévaluation de la qualité de vie des enfants implantés cochléaires. Annales Franc¸aises d’Otorhino-laryngologie et de Pathologie Cervico-faciale, 133, 29-33.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aforl.2015.01.012
  • Rekkedal, A. R. (2012). Assistive hearing technologies among students with hearing impairment: Factors that promote satisfaction. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 17, 499-517, http://DOI:10.1093/deafed/ens023.
  • Roche, J. P. y Hansen, M. R. (2015). On the Horizon: Cochlear implant technology. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 48, 1097-1116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2015.07.009
  • Sarant, J. y Garrard, P. (2014). Parenting stress in parents of children with cochlear implants: Relationships among parent stress child language, and unilateral versus bilateral implants. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 19, 85-106, http://doi:10.1093/deafed/ent032.
  • Upton, P., Lawford, J. y Eiser, C. H. (2008). Parent-child agreement across child health-related quality of life instruments: A review of the literature. Quality of Life Research, 17, 895-913. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9350-5
  • Warner-Czyz, A. D., Loy, B., Tobey, E. A., Nakonezny, P. y Roland, P. S. (2011). Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents who use cochlear implants. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 75, 95-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.10.018
  • Wiefferink, C. H., Rieffe, C., Ketelaar, L., de Raeve, L. y Frijns, J. H. (2013). Emotion understanding in deaf children with a cochlear implant. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 18, 175-186, http://doi: 10.1093/deafed/ens042.
  • Zhao, Y., Li, Y., Zheng, Z., Li, J., Nie, X., Jin, X. y Ni, X. (2018). Health-related quality of life in Mandarin-Speaking children with cochlear implants. Ear & Hearing, XX, 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000633
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet