Aproximación a la semántica del contrafactual

  1. Mabel Alejandra Urrutia Martínez 1
  2. Manuel de Vega Rodríguez 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Laguna Facultad de Psicología Departamento de Psicología Cognitiva, Social y Organizacional
Revista:
Estudios filológicos

ISSN: 0071-1713

Año de publicación: 2012

Número: 49

Páginas: 157-173

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.4067/S0071-17132012000100010 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Estudios filológicos

Resumen

En este trabajo se explican aspectos fundamentales del contrafactual, como sus funciones en el razonamiento causal, en la argumentación científica, en la modulación y amplificación de las emociones. También se describen los diversos tipos de contrafactuales y las diferencias individuales en la producción y comprensión de éstos. Posteriormente, se explican las principales teorías e investigaciones que han planteado el tema del significado dual del contrafactual: los modelos mentales, las teorías proposicionales del razonamiento o la teoría suposicional. Finalmente, se dedica especial atención a las pocas investigaciones que se han realizado en el campo de la psicolingüística sobre la comprensión de contrafactuales.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Atkinson, L,Bell, D,Feeney, A. (2009). The relationship between counterfactual thinking and emotional reactions to event outcomes: Does one account fit all?". Psychonomic Bulletin ... Review. 16. 724-728
  • Byrne, R. (2002). Mental models and counterfactual thoughts about what might have been. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 6. 426-431
  • Byrne, R. (2005). The rational imagination: How people create alternatives to reality. MIT Press. Cambridge^eM. A M. A.
  • Byrne, R,Girotto, V. (2009). Handbook of imagination and mental simulation. Psychology Press. New York.
  • Byrne, R,Tasso, A. (1999). Deductive reasoning with factual, possible, and counterfactual conditionals. Memory & Cognition. 27. 309-323
  • De Vega, M,Urrutia, M,Riffo, B. (2007). Cancelling updating in the comprehension of counterfactuals embedded in narratives. Memory & Cognition. 35. 1410-1421
  • Evans, J. (2006). The heuristic analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 13. 378-395
  • Evans, J,Over, D,Handley, S. (2005). Supositions, Extensionality, and Conditionals: A Critique of the mental model theory of Johnson-Laird and Byrne (2002). Psychological Review. 112. 1040-1052
  • Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge University Press. New York.
  • Fauconnier, G,Sweetser, E. (1996). Spaces worlds and grammar. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
  • Ferguson, H.J,Sanford, A.J. (2008). Anomalies in real and counterfactual worlds: An eye-movement investigation. Journal of Memory and Language. 58. 609-626
  • Ferguson, H.J,Sanford, A.J,Leuthold, H. (2008). Eye-movements and ERPs reveal the time course of processing negation and remitting counterfactual worlds. Brain Research. 1236. 113-125
  • García, J. (2009). Condición e hipótesis: Más allá de lo real y lo irreal. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas. 4. 79-88
  • Gilovich, T,Medvec, V. (1994). The temporal pattern to the experience of regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 67. 357-365
  • Gusnard, D. A,Akbudak, E,Shulman, G. L,Raichle, M. E. (2001). Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: relation to a default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academic of the Sciences. 98. 4259-4264
  • Harris, P.L,German, T.P,Mills, M. (1996). Children' s use of counterfactual thinking in causal reasoning. Cognition. 61. 223-259
  • Haynes, J-D,Sakai, K,Rees, G,Gilbert, S,Frith, C,Passingham, D. (2007). Reading hidden intentions in the human brain. Current Biology. 17. 323-328
  • Jasper, J,Barry, K,Christman, S. (2008). Individual differences in counterfactual production. Personality and individual differences. 45. 488-492
  • Johnson-Laird, P.N,Byrne, R.M.J. (2002). Conditionals: a theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference. Psychological Review. 109. 646-678
  • Kahneman, D,Tversky, A. (1982). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press. New York.
  • Kahneman, D. (1995). What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking. Lawrence erlbaum associates, publishers. Mahwah^eNew Jersey New Jersey.
  • Kasimatis, M,Wells, G. (1995). What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Mahwah^eNew Jersey New Jersey.
  • Kray, L.J,Gelfand, M. (2009). Relief Versus Regret: The Effect of Gender and Negotiating Norm Ambiguity on Reactions to Having One' s First Offer Accepted". Social Cognition. 27. 418-436
  • Leslie, A. (1987). Pretense and Representation: The origins of "theory of mind". Psychological Review. 94. 412-426
  • Leslie, A,Friedman, O,German, T. (2004). Core mechanisms in" theory of mind'. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 8. 528-533
  • Macmullen, M,Markman, K,Gavanski, I. (1995). What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking. Lawrence Erlbaum. Mahwah^eNew Jersey New Jersey.
  • Mandel, D.R. (2003). Effect of counterfactual and factual thinking on causal judgements. Thinking and Reasoning. 9. 245-265
  • Markman, K.D,Karadogan, F,Lindberg, M.J,ZELL, E. (2009). Handbook of imagination and mental simulation. Psychology Press. New York.
  • Roese, N,Olson, J. (1995). What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Mahwah^eNew Jersey New Jersey.
  • Roese, N,Olson, J. (1997). Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic Press. San Diego^eCA CA.
  • Roese, N. J,Sanna, L. J,Galinsky, A. D. (2005). The New Unconscious. Oxford University Press. New York.
  • Roese, N. (2005). If only: How to turn regret into opportunity. Broadway Books. New York.
  • Santamaría, C,Espino, O,Byrne, R. (2005). Counterfactual and semifactual conditionals prime alternative possibilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 31. 1149-1154
  • Searle, J. (1980). Minds, brains and programs. Behavioral and brain sciences. 3. 417-457
  • Sirois, R. (2004). Procrastination and counterfactual thinking: Avoiding what might have been. British Journal of Social Psychology. 43. 269-286
  • Spellman, B,Mandel, D. (1999). When possibility informs reality: Counterfactual thinking as a cue to causality. Current Directions In Psychological Sciences. 8. 120-123
  • Stewart, A. J,Haigh, M,Kidd, E. (2009). An investigation into the en-linea processing of counterfactual and indicative conditionals. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 62. 2113-2125
  • Thompson, V,Byrne, R. (2002). Reasoning Counterfactually: Making inferences about things that didn' t happen. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 28. 1154-1170
  • Urrutia, M,Marrero, H,Castillo, M.D,Hernández, J.A,De Vega, M. (2009). Individual differences in the comprehension of counterfactual stories. An ERP study. Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse. Rotterdam.
  • Urrutia, M,Gennari, S,De Vega, M. (2010). Counterfactuals in action: An fMRI study. Congreso Embodied Mind: Perspectives and Limitations. Nijmegen.
  • Wells, G. L,Gavanski, I. (1989). Mental simulation of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 53. 421-430
  • West, W.C,Holcomb, P.J. (2000). Imaginal, semantic, and surface-level: Processing of concrete and abstract words: An electrophysiological Investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 12. 1024-1037
  • Wong, E.M,Galinsky, A.D,Kray, L.J. (2009). Handbook of imagination and mental simulation. Psychology press. New York.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet