Identifying preservice teachers’ belief profiles and their performance in a web-based training for writing instruction

  1. Rocío C. Seoane 1
  2. Juan E. Jiménez 1
  3. Nuria Gutiérrez 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Laguna
    info

    Universidad de La Laguna

    San Cristobal de La Laguna, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01r9z8p25

Revista:
Psicología educativa

ISSN: 1135-755X

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 29

Número: 2

Páginas: 121-132

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5093/PSED2023A8 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicología educativa

Resumen

Esta investigación tiene como objetivo cubrir la necesidad de proporcionar formación en la enseñanza de la escritura a maestros y maestras en formación mediante el uso de un programa web. La aportación novedosa de este trabajo radica en la consideración de las creencias como prerrequisito metodológico a la hora de medir los efectos de un programa web. Con este fin, antes de la instrucción web se realizó un análisis de perfiles latentes con el fin de explorar perfiles únicos de creencias sobre la escritura en maestros y maestras en formación. Se clasificó a los participantes en tres perfiles: perfil ecléctico (n = 129), sociocultural (n = 85) y persona-ambiente (n = 105). Se emplearon modelos mixtos lineales para evaluar si los perfiles de creencias experimentaban cambios en las creencias y el conocimiento después de la formación. Los resultados muestran que los perfiles de creencias difieren entre si en el grado de atribución de las diferentes creencias, pero todos ellos experimentan diferencias significativas en la adquisición del conocimiento de contenidos. Finalmente, se destacan las implicaciones educativas para la formación de futuros docentes.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2013). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: A 3-step approach using Mplus. http://statmodel.com/ examples/webnotes/AuxMixture_submitted_corrected_webnote.pdf
  • Baum, A. C., & King, M. A. (2006). Creating a climate of self-awareness in early childhood teacher preparation programs. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(4), 217-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643- 005-0050-2
  • Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixedmodels using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48. https:// doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  • Bakk, Z., & Kuha, J. (2021). Relating latent class membership to external variables: An overview. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 74(2), 340-362. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12227
  • Berninger, V. W. (2000). Development of language by hand and its connections with language by ear, mouth, and eye. Topics in Language Disorders, 20(4), 65-84. https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363- 200020040-00007
  • Berninger, V. W., & Winn, W. D. (2006). Implications of advancements in brain research and technology for writing development, writing instruction, and educational evolution. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 96-114). The Guilford Press.
  • Birisci, S. (2017). Identifying effectiveness of online group study on mathematical problem solving attitude: A comparative study. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(7), 223-241. https://doi. org/10.5281/zenodo.814239
  • Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J. E., & Shavelson, R. (2015). Beyond dichotomies: Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223(1), 2-13. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000194
  • Brenner, D., & McQuirk, A. (2019). A snapshot of writing in elementary teacher preparation programs. The New Educator, 15(1), 18-29. https:// doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2018.1427291
  • Çakiroglu, A. (2019). The language acquisition approaches and the development of literacy skills in children. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 11(2), 201-206. https://doi. org/10.26822/iejee.2019248600
  • Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Mouton. Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199. https://doi. org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
  • Dunst, C. J., Hamby, D. W., Howse, R. B., Wilkie, H., & Annas, K. (2019). Metasynthesis of pre-service professional preparation and teacher education research studies. Education Sciences, 9(1), Article 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9010050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ S135561771700039X
  • Eichler, A., & Erens, R. (2015). Domain-specific belief systems of secondary mathematics teachers. In B. Pepin & B. Roesken-Winter (Eds.), From beliefs to dynamic affect systems in mathematics education (pp. 179- 200). Springer.
  • Ferrara, M. (2017). Understanding family engagement through the focus of the national standards for family-school partnerships: Secondary pre-service teachers’ perspectives. School Community Journal, 27(2), 145-166. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1165649
  • Finch, W. H., Bolin, J. E., & Kelley, K. (2019). Multilevel modeling using R. Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351062268
  • Graham, S., Harris, K. R., MacArthur, C., & Fink, B. (2002). Primary grade teachers’ theoretical orientations concerning writing instruction: Construct validation and a nationwide survey. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(2), 147-166. https://doi.org/10.1006/ ceps.2001.1085
  • Green, T.F. (1971). The activities of teaching. McGraw-Hill Book Company. Hayes, J. R., & Olinghouse, N. G. (2015). Can cognitive writing models inform the design of the common core state standards? The elementary school journal, 115(4), 480-497. https://doi.org/10.1086/681909
  • Hickendorff, M., Edelsbrunner, P. A., McMullen, J., Schneider, M., & Trezise, K. (2018). Informative tools for characterizing individual differences in learning: Latent class, latent profile, and latent transition analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 66, 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. lindif.2017.11.001
  • Hodges, T. S., Wright, K. L., & McTigue, E. (2019). What do middle grades preservice teachers believe about writing and writing instruction? RMLE Online, 42(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2019.1565508
  • Jiménez, J. E., & Gil, V. (2019). IPAE: indicadores de progreso de aprendizaje en escritura [Indicators of basic early writing skills] [Supplemental material]. In J. E. Jiménez (Ed.), Modelo de respuesta a la intervención. Un enfoque preventivo para el abordaje de las dificultades de aprendizaje [Response to intervention model. A preventive aproach for learning disabilities]. Pirámide.
  • Jiménez, J. E., & O’Shanahan, I. (2016). Effects of web-based training on Spanish pre-service and in-service teacher knowledge and implicit beliefs on learning to read. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 175- 187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.006
  • Jiménez, J. E., Seoane, R. C., García, E., & de León, S. C. (2021). Effects of web-based training on Spanish pre-service and in-service teacher knowledge and implicit beliefs on learning to write. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(1), 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/ jcal
  • Jiménez, J.E., Seoane, R.C., Guzmán, R., Rodríguez, C., González, D., Suárez, N., O’Shanahan, I., García, E., Morales, C., de León, S.C., & Gutiérrez, N. (2020). Plataforma Web_Trazo: programa tutorial para la formación docente en el modelo de respuesta a la intervención en escritura [WebTrazo Platform: Tutorial program for teacher training in the response to intervention model in writing]. Universidad de La Laguna.
  • Johansson, S., & Myrberg, E. (2019). Teacher specialization and student perceived instructional quality: What are the relationships to student reading achievement? Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 31(2), 177-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-019- 09297-5
  • Kolin, P. C. (2022). Successful writing at work. Cengage Learning.
  • Koster, M. P., Tribushinina, E., De Jong, P., & Van den Bergh, H. H. (2015). Teaching children to write: A meta-analysis of writing intervention research. Journal of writing research, 7(2), 299-324. https://doi. org/10.17239/jowr-2015.07.02.2
  • Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of statistical software, 82(13), 1-26. https://10.18637/jss.v082.i13
  • Lanza, S. T., Tan, X., & Bray, B. C. (2013). Latent class analysis with distal outcomes: A flexible model-based approach. Structural equation modeling: A multidisciplinary journal, 20(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1 080/10705511.2013.742377
  • Lenth, R. V. (2021). emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka leastsquares means. R package version 1.7.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/ package=emmeans
  • Luo, T., Hibbard, L., Franklin, T., & Moore, D. R. (2017). Preparing teacher candidates for virtual field placements via an exposure to K-12 online teaching. Journal of Information Technology Education Research, 16(16), 1-14. http://www.informingscience.org/Publications/3626
  • McLarnon, M. J., & O’Neill, T. A. (2018). Extensions of auxiliary variable approaches for the investigation of mediation, moderation, and conditional effects in mixture models. Organizational Research Methods, 21(4), 955-982. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118770731
  • Morrow, L. M. (2012). Literacy development in the early years: Helping children read and write (7th Ed.). Pearson.
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th Ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
  • Myrberg, E., Johansson, S., & Rosén, M. (2019). The relation between teacher specialization and student reading achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 63(5), 744-758. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031 3831.2018.1434826
  • Oliveira, C., Lopes, J., & Spear-Swerling, L. (2019). Teachers’ academic training for literacy instruction. European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 315-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1576627
  • Pajares, M. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
  • Reichert, F., & Torney-Purta, J. (2019). A cross-national comparison of teachers’ beliefs about the aims of civic education in 12 countries: A person-centered analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 112- 125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.005
  • Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102- 119). Simon and Schuster/Macmillan.
  • Rietdijk, S., van Weijen, D., Janssen, T., van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2018). Teaching writing in primary education: Classroom practice, time, teachers’ beliefs and skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(5), 640-663.
  • Rodrigo, M., Rodríguez, A., & Marrero, J. (1993). Las teorías implícitas: una aproximación al conocimiento cotidiano [Implicit theories: An approach to daily knowledge]. Alianza Editorial.
  • R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.Rproject.org/
  • Saine, P., & West, J. A. (2017). Content area teacher candidates’ self-efficacy beliefs of teaching writing online. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(2), 69-77.
  • Santagata, R., & Yeh, C. (2016). The role of perception, interpretation, and decision making in the development of beginning teachers’ competence. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(1),153-165. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11858-015-0737-9
  • Scott, C. E., McTigue, E. M., Miller, D. M., & Washburn, E. K. (2018). The what, when, and how of preservice teachers and literacy across the disciplines: A systematic literature review of nearly 50 years of research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 1-13. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.010
  • Seoane, R. C., Jiménez, J. E., & Gutiérrez, N. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ implicit theories of learning to write. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(2), 165 -190. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1681964
  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57 (1), 1-23. https://doi-org. accedys2.bbtk.ull.es/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  • Smidt, W., Kammermeyer, G., & Roux, S. (2015). Relations between the Big Five personality traits of prospective early childhood pedagogues and their beliefs about the education of preschool children: Evidence from a German study. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 96-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.002
  • Stricklin, K., & Tingle, B. (2016). Using online education to transition teaching assistants to teacher certification: Examining the differences between teacher education programs. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(3), 192-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.11 92840
  • Tracey, D. H., & Mandel, L. (2012). Lenses on reading: An introduction to theories and models. The Guilford Press.
  • Ulum, H. (2022). The effects of online education on academic success: A meta-analysis study. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 429-450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10740-8
  • Vygotsky, L. (1979). El desarrollo de los procesos psicológicos superiores [The development of superior psychological processes]. Crítica.
  • Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2019). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Zhang, Z., Li, J., Liu, F., & Miao, Z. (2016). Hong Kong and Canadian students experiencing a new participatory culture: A teacher professional training project undergirded by new media literacies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 146-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tate.2016.05.01